Fuzzy Agent based model framework for BIM Adoption for Facility Management in the New Zealand Construction Industry from Stakeholders Collaboration Perspective

Essay topics:

Fuzzy Agent-based model framework for BIM Adoption for Facility Management in the New Zealand Construction Industry from Stakeholders' Collaboration Perspective

I. INTRODUCTION AND PORTRAYING THE CURRENT PROBLEM
The potential benefits of building information modeling (BIM) for facility management (FM) have been acknowledged by the architecture, engineering, construction, and operations (AECO) industry. The remarkable benefits of 6D BIM are to deliver precise, timely, and appropriate information all over the lifecycle of an entire portfolio of facilities, not just during the design and construction phases (Naghshbandi 2016). BIM-FM has the potential to add value to the building asset throughout its lifecycle by providing semantically rich visual representations of facilities (Enegbuma et al. 2014). Although BIM has become more commonly adopted by the AECO participants and its capability to support FM has become unequivocally evident, its widespread acceptance and adoption have remained an unsolved issue globally. In New Zealand also, BIM adoption is still in its infancy, and the level of BIM uptake, especially amongst small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), which account for 97% of the total construction companies, is indispensably low (Harrison and Thurnell 2015). Therefore most construction projects are not BIM-centric, especially in "post-construction" phases such as facilities management. (Tran et al. 2012).
According to scholars, a vital step to reap the benefits of BIM in the facility management phase is to determine the problems and concerns that affect the excellent performance of facility operation and maintenance activities among the stakeholders. Stakeholders include project owners, users, project manager, facility manager, designers, legal authorities, employees, contractors, subcontractors, suppliers, sponsors, and the natural environment who, besides organizational rules and established physical processes, have their subjective attributes and behavioral rules.
As mentioned by Liu and Issa (2016), BIM is regarded as a way of designing, constructing, running, and maintaining an asset as a collaborative process. Collaboration can be seen as working together in a seamless team for common objectives that deliver benefit to all (Enegbuma et al. 2016). In other words, BIM is the collaboration of various stakeholders at different stages of a facility's life cycle to insert, extract, update or modify building information in the model to support and reflect the roles of that stakeholder (Enegbuma et al. 2014). Although collaboration amongst stakeholders who must adjust their technologies, processes, and capabilities to align with BIM requirements has the highest impact on BIM uptake, in research by Doan et al. (2020), the insufficiency of collaboration and coordination was confirmed by key construction practitioners as a substantial challenge/barrier on the road to BIM uptake in New Zealand's AECO industry. In another related research, Okakpu et al. (2020) confirmed that a lack of collaboration is among the risk factors that caused a decline in BIM adoption among New Zealand construction firms. Therefore, there is a need to deeply understand BIM-FM stakeholders and their interactions, thereby constructing a framework to allow managers to handle them more effectively. In this regard, identifying and then removing BIM stakeholders' collaboration barriers could play a pivotal role in eliminating BIM-FM use hurdles and conquering its full advantages.
Agent-based modeling (ABM), a modeling technique that is relatively new to the field of construction management, has been used to simulate complex systems of interacting agents (Berglund 2015). In light of subjective uncertainty in BIM-FM stakeholders' collaboration, there is a need to consider more complex agent models in human behavior and social relationships. Fuzzy logic is useful in vague and uncertain environments, as it is the case in the study of human societies. Therefore, the modeling can be done using a fuzzy agent-based model (FABM). FABM is defined by four components: a FABM model architecture, a set of agents specified by their attributes and behaviors, a set of agents' relationships, and methods for interaction (Kedir et al. 2020; Raoufi and Fayek 2018)
II. PREVIOUS WORKS
While the positive value that BIM can add to FM practice has been described in detail and long-anticipated, the facility management (6D) aspect, BIM-FM, has not caught adequate attention worldwide, and the 6D phase has barely been addressed in current BIM research. Edirisinghe et al. (2017) reviewed 207 BIM published studies; their study revealed that there are very few papers on BIM in FM. In the New Zealand context, which is the focus of the current research proposal, academia has mainly concentrated on potential benefits and challenges of BIM applications (e.g., Davies et al. 2017; Doan et al. 2020; GhaffarianHoseini et al. 2017; Harrison and Thurnell 2015; Stanley and Thurnell 2014). Despite a gradually increasing number of published works since 2007, which are generally limited to identifying benefits and barriers, BIM adoption research in New Zealand has received insufficient attention from scholars. This neglect hinders the understanding of BIM stakeholders, ultimately harming the development of the BIM-FM sector.
Specifically, when it comes to BIM stakeholders, a few published works can be found. Recently Okakpu et al. (2019) empirically compared the real potential benefits between traditional network and BIM network for a real-time refurbishment case study project through agent-based simulation modeling of stakeholder interaction. In another related work, Okakpu et al. (2020) identified peculiar risks associated with refurbishment projects for BIM adoption from stakeholder perceptions in New Zealand. Although these works are first steps toward BIM stakeholder’s management in the New Zealand AEC industry, their focus is on building refurbishment projects with characteristics that differ fundamentally from those in FM practices. Additionally, without integrating the fuzzy concept to the agent-based simulation modeling known as FABM, this technique cannot handle the subjective uncertainty in the variables and the stakeholder’s relationships in construction systems. Finally, even though the literature review showing a lack of effective collaboration among stakeholders hinders BIM development in New Zealand, research has ignored BIM adoption issues specifically from the stakeholder's collaboration perspective. Hence, it can be inferred that the literature has remained silent about BIM-FM uptake among different stakeholders considering subjective uncertainty exists in the variables and the relationships of the BIM stakeholders. Therefore, there is a research gap, about impact of dynamic and complex interactions between BIM-FM stakeholders' behaviors in BIM-FM adoption.

III. RESEARCH AIM AND OBJECTIVES
The principal aim of this research is to examine the current collaboration frameworks and develop an optimized alternative framework using fuzzy agent-based simulation modeling of New Zealand BIM-FM stakeholders from a collaboration perspective with particular attention to the subjective uncertainty and behavioral rules that exist in construction systems and societies relationships. Based on this research aim, four objectives are defined as follows:

(1) identify of key agents and activities along with perceived drivers of and barriers to BIM-FM adoption among New Zealand BIM-FM stakeholders from a collaborative perspective; (2) simulate and visualize dynamic and static interactions of agents by developing a fuzzy agent-based simulation model of stakeholders interactions capable of prioritizing and ranking the adoption barriers taking into account the impact of stakeholders behaviors as a whole; (3) formulate an optimized collaborative framework that can be adopted by New Zealand BIM-FM practitioners toward increasing BIM-FM uptake in AECO industry; and (4) demonstrate the application of the framework to case studies.
Finally, the research question can be designed as follows:
What is an optimized collaborative framework from a collaboration perspective capable of considering both static and dynamic impacts of stakeholders?

IV. SUMMARISED RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

This study involves a three-stage of data collection, analysis, and interpretation to address the research question. The research consists of three studies to address the key research question. The role of the studies are as follows:

Studies Ⅰ and Ⅱ:
Since BIM-FM is in its early stages, the aim of these studies is to provide a range of data that is currently unlikely to be found by either reviewing the available literature or field survey. Study Ⅰ involves a questionnaire-centered survey of international BIM and FM researchers. Study Ⅱ involves semi-structured interviews with New Zealand subject-matter experts. For the purpose of the research, in studies, Ⅰ and Ⅱ two sets of data will be collected. Set 1 includes identification of agents, activities, and institutions of the different players in BIM-FM, which will be extracted from a questionnaire with key representatives of each of the stakeholders. Set 2 includes data about existing collaborative practices of BIM-FM in the New Zealand AECO industry using semi-structured interviews with New Zealand subject-matter experts and with key representatives of each of the stakeholders.

Study Ⅲ:
Based on gathered data in the studies Ⅰ and Ⅱ, in the Study Ⅲ, using a methodology framework adopted from Raoufi and Fayek (2018), first, the Fuzzy Agent-Based Model Architecture will be determined, then, the basic structure of agents, including the types of attributes and behaviors of each agent in the model, will be defined. After which, agent static or dynamic interactions will be defined, then to account for and incorporate the subjective uncertainty involved in agent behavioral rules, using fuzzy rules, agent behavioral rules will be defined. Finally, the simulation experiment will be performed using ANYLOGIC and MATLAB soft wares. The research will end with an optimized collaboration framework for BIM-FM practitioners in New Zealand, proposing practical solutions for BIM-FM adoption, which its application will be examined using various case studies.
The proposed study that can be classified as a semi-qualitative data-driven stakeholder analysis is novel concerning (1) the application of FABM in the analysis of stakeholders' complex behavior in BIM-FM, (2) visualization of the stakeholders' interactions in BIM-FM, (3) Identifying BIM-FM uptake barriers from stakeholders' collaboration perspective.
V. POSSIBLE OUTCOMES
The research will provide valuable insights into BIM-FM uptake barriers. The results could be considered baseline information for the companies and government to have effective strategies towards BIM stakeholder's management and, ultimately, BIM adoption. Using the proposed research outputs, it is hoped that the BIM policymaking landscape can be enhanced; this can help to tackle the BIM stakeholders related challenges and pave the way toward the further adoption of BIM in the New Zealand construction industry.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ION AND PORTRAYING THE CURRENT PROBLEM The potential benefits of building infor...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 832, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ved issue globally. In New Zealand also, BIM adoption is still in its infancy, an...
^^
Line 2, column 1069, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...ensably low Harrison and Thurnell 2015. Therefore most construction projects are not BI...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1113, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...efore most construction projects are not BIM-centric, especially in 'post-co...
^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lities management. Tran et al. 2012. According to scholars, a vital step to r...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 580, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ective attributes and behavioral rules. As mentioned by Liu and Issa 2016, BIM i...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 913, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ial challenge/barrier on the road to BIM uptake in New Zealands AECO industry. In...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s and conquering its full advantages. Agent-based modeling ABM, a modeling tec...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ufi and Fayek 2018 II. PREVIOUS WORKS While the positive value that BIM can ad...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 306, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ch. Edirisinghe et al. 2017 reviewed 207 BIM published studies; their study revea...
^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the development of the BIM-FM sector. Specifically, when it comes to BIM stake...
^^^^
Line 8, column 715, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... that differ fundamentally from those in FM practices. Additionally, without inte...
^^
Line 8, column 1178, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'stakeholders'' or 'stakeholder's'?
Suggestion: stakeholders'; stakeholder's
...M adoption issues specifically from the stakeholders collaboration perspective. Hence, it ca...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 34, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...on. III. RESEARCH AIM AND OBJECTIVES The principal aim of this research is to...
^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 659, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rate the application of the framework to case studies. Finally, the research que...
^^
Line 18, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... IV. SUMMARISED RESEARCH METHODOLOGY This study involves a three-stage of dat...
^^^^^^^
Line 21, column 17, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...dies are as follows: Studies Ⅰ and Ⅱ: Since BIM-FM is in its early stages, the...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 26, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ach of the stakeholders. Study Ⅲ: Based on gathered data in the studies Ⅰ ...
^^^^^
Line 27, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... examined using various case studies. The proposed study that can be classifie...
^^^^^
Line 29, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ion perspective. V. POSSIBLE OUTCOMES The research will provide valuable insig...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, e.g., finally, first, hence, if, so, still, then, therefore, while, such as, in other words

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 52.0 13.1623246493 395% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 26.0 7.85571142285 331% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 65.0 10.4138276553 624% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 24.0 7.30460921844 329% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 43.0 24.0651302605 179% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 212.0 41.998997996 505% => Less preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 80.0 8.3376753507 960% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 9505.0 1615.20841683 588% => Less number of characters wanted.
No of words: 1621.0 315.596192385 514% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.86366440469 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 6.34520640156 4.20363070211 151% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.52152481028 2.80592935109 126% => OK
Unique words: 623.0 176.041082164 354% => Less unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.384330660086 0.561755894193 68% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 2925.0 506.74238477 577% => syllable counts are too long.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 19.0 2.52805611222 752% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 8.0 2.10420841683 380% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 11.0 0.809619238477 1359% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 16.0 4.76152304609 336% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 62.0 16.0721442886 386% => Too many sentences.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 115.208204052 49.4020404114 233% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 153.306451613 106.682146367 144% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1451612903 20.7667163134 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.79032258065 7.06120827912 25% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 20.0 4.38176352705 456% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 20.0 5.01903807615 398% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 27.0 8.67935871743 311% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 26.0 3.4128256513 762% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.45714982017 0.244688304435 187% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101088301298 0.084324248473 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0813485771961 0.0667982634062 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147434280827 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.125109641771 0.056905535591 220% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.2 13.0946893788 147% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 28.17 50.2224549098 56% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.0 12.4159519038 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.13 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 432.0 78.4519038076 551% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 17.0 9.78957915832 174% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.67 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.