Epstein and Lessig are two author discussing the copy wrights significants but very different ways. Epstein who support the idea of copy writing and Lessig who oppose it. Among that two person point of view I am more keen to the lessig's statement- certain thing we cannot deny to access the sources whether it is for private work or for the public. Here I want to take position in Lessig's statements for the following evidence which I have found from their both passages.
Epstein, says that "John Locke- a great philosopher in 19th century who stated that every society recognize the natural rights of it's citizen". In that way one's property should and must be protected and not limited to their works such as films, songs, artworks and so on. This seems like, everyone work's should get the credit for what they done in their field. So that, they can make some money by limiting other coping it(Epstein). But, when comes to practical point of certain sources are essential for people even without their permission which we cannot avoid by the name of copy writing. For instance, Lessig says- Einstein statement are more significant for the scientific communities those wants to establish further about the Einstein theory and his approach. In this scenario, it is possible to get permission from owner of that statement. So, here the society we will be limited in expanding the knowledge and the skills.
Epstein, states- ("author looking for credit for their works with simple terms like attribution only. But most of them looking for compensation by any means of sources) which is kind embarrassing situation for both the creates and the those wants to use that sources. Lessig argues that even though some time we need personal freedom and property rights like protection for house and cars, and no should not bring the riffle under my desk. Here, It is has good purposes and vision but it cannot be implemented verywhere we want it. For example, "Mature society realizes that value by protecting such resources from both private and public(Lessig).
Eptein says that hounering those created the certain elements is ethic, it is ture, I am not denying it but how to make more protectivity by using that sources. "The Internet is best free re-sources for the innovation and incredible, those whose question about free access: Internet is the best answer for them".(Lessig). In this way free access does not harm anyone event hough giving credit to the author as professional ethic.
To conclude, the free access to sources give more advantages to the society where we live peacefully. When permission is moral and professional ethical, still, certain circumstancess we can signal to the free access to acquire qnd establish our knowledge in great degree.
- TPO-31 - Integrated Writing Task A fossil skeleton of a dinosaur called Sinosauropteryx, preserved in volcanic ash, was discovered in Liaoning, China, in 1996. Interestingly, the fossil included a pattern of fine lines surrounding the skeletal bones. Some 81
- tpo7 60
- Task1: Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific theories discussed in the reading passage.Reading: As early as the twelfth century A.D., the settlements of Chaco Canyon in New Mexico in the Americ 60
- TPO-21 - Integrated Writing Task Genetic modification, a process used to change an organism’s genes and hence its characteristics, is now being used to improve trees through genetic modification. It is possible to create trees that produce more fruit, g 86
- Question:-> Summarize the points made in the lecture you just heard, explaining how they cast doubt on points made in the reading.Reading Passage:->Scant physical evidence remains of the first human domestication of grain. Still, there is enough to conclu 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 19, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Epstein and Lessig are two author discussing the copy wrig...
^^
Line 1, column 29, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'author' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'authors'.
Suggestion: authors
Epstein and Lessig are two author discussing the copy wrights significan...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 35, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Epstein and Lessig are two author discussing the copy wrights significants...
^^
Line 3, column 167, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...ights of its citizen'. In that way ones property should and must be protected a...
^^^^
Line 3, column 271, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eir works such as films, songs, artworks and so on. This seems like, everyone wor...
^^
Line 3, column 352, Rule ID: PRP_PAST_PART[1]
Message: Possible grammatical error. You used a past participle without using any required verb ('be' or 'have'). Did you mean 'did'?
Suggestion: did
...rks should get the credit for what they done in their field. So that, they can make ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 88, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t for their works with simple terms like attribution only. But most of them looki...
^^
Line 5, column 399, Rule ID: NOW[1]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
...like protection for house and cars, and no should not bring the riffle under my de...
^^
Line 8, column 87, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...ertain elements is ethic, it is ture, I am not denying it but how to make more protectivity by...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 323, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Lessig
...ernet is the best answer for them'.Lessig. In this way free access does not harm ...
^^^^^^
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ish our knowledge in great degree.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, so, still, for example, for instance, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 10.4138276553 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 21.0 7.30460921844 287% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 50.0 24.0651302605 208% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2345.0 1615.20841683 145% => OK
No of words: 461.0 315.596192385 146% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08676789588 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.63367139033 4.20363070211 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68674866621 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 248.0 176.041082164 141% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537960954447 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 703.8 506.74238477 139% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 16.0721442886 137% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.0215483377 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.590909091 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9545454545 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.72727272727 7.06120827912 39% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 11.0 5.01903807615 219% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 8.67935871743 207% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0563401662767 0.244688304435 23% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0201048222979 0.084324248473 24% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0259824076607 0.0667982634062 39% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0311409062868 0.151304729494 21% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0181890159274 0.056905535591 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 0.67 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.