The ability to learn more than one language will be less important in the future. Do you agree or disagree?
Recently, the phenomenon of speaking two or more language and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of being bilingual is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thorough both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that learning a language can be a plus and I will discuss that throughout this essay.
From the conversational standpoint, learning languages can provide a society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that having fewer culture shocks as well as globalization are inextricably bound up. According to my personal experience, when I was a university student, I performed an experiment which discovered speaking a new language reduce the culture shock's rate. Thus, the beneficial consequences of globalization and linguistic skill apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of linguistic skills, speaking a dead language might exacerbate the consequences of dominant language. Moreover, the fundamental aspect of conversation related to this reality that the demerit of a dead language pertains to the power of expression As a tangible example, a scientific research undertook by a prestigious university has asserted the downsides of vernacular language is correlated negatively with learning a various language. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceive the notion of globalization.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of learning and speaking more than one language overweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of being bilingual widely used around the world, but also pinpoint dead languages implications.
- Law can change human behavior. Do you agree or not? 85
- If you want to study a particular area of climate change, which area/subject will you choose? 11
- Dangerous activities like extreme skiing, bungee jumping, etc. and whether you support them or not. 55
- The most important thing about a job is how much money you earn in that job Do you agree or disagree 83
- Many people believe that they should spend their money to enjoy life at present. Others, however, think that they should save it for the future. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 490, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...nguage. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceive the notion of globalization. To conc...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1488.0 1207.87684729 123% => OK
No of words: 265.0 242.827586207 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.61509433962 5.00649968141 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.27653664976 2.71678728327 121% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 139.433497537 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615094339623 0.580463131201 106% => OK
syllable_count: 470.7 379.143842365 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 70.4673888587 50.4703680194 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.272727273 104.977214359 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0909090909 20.9669160288 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.25397266985 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 6.9802955665 43% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213068977324 0.242375264174 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0743907014417 0.0925447433944 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0547260059628 0.071462118173 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129074665968 0.151781067708 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0613540480638 0.0609392437508 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 12.6369458128 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 53.1260098522 57% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.61 11.5310837438 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.19 8.32886699507 122% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 55.0591133005 163% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.