The ability to learn more than one language will be less important in the future. Do you agree or disagree?

Recently, the phenomenon of speaking two or more language in the future and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of being bilingual is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thorough both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that learning a various language can be a plus and I will discuss that throughout this essay.

From the conversational standpoint, learning languages can provide a society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that different civilization, as well as globalization, are inextricably bound up. According to my personal experience, when I was a university student, I performed an experiment which discovered speaking a new official language increase the job opportunities' rate. Thus, the beneficial consequences of cognitive and linguistic skill apparently can be seen.

Within the realm of linguistic skills, speaking a dead language might exacerbate the consequences of culture shock. Moreover, the fundamental aspect of speaking a dominant language related to this reality that the demerit of a native language pertains to the power of expression As a tangible example, a scientific research undertook by a prestigious university has asserted the downsides of vernacular language is correlated negatively with learning a various language. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceive the notion of boarding our horizons.

To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of learning and speaking more than one language overweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of being bilingual widely used around the world, but also pinpoint career implications.

Votes
Average: 8.8 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 504, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...nguage. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceive the notion of boarding our horizons. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1526.0 1207.87684729 126% => OK
No of words: 272.0 242.827586207 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.61029411765 5.00649968141 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.26132575416 2.71678728327 120% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 139.433497537 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.628676470588 0.580463131201 108% => OK
syllable_count: 484.2 379.143842365 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 73.7906352543 50.4703680194 146% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.727272727 104.977214359 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7272727273 20.9669160288 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.25397266985 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213861778577 0.242375264174 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0718407739616 0.0925447433944 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0523231270261 0.071462118173 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12738686123 0.151781067708 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0488709224318 0.0609392437508 80% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 12.6369458128 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 53.1260098522 57% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.55 11.5310837438 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.4 8.32886699507 125% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 55.0591133005 174% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.