The ability to learn more than one language will be less important in future. Do you agree or disagree?
Recently, the phenomenon of learning more than one language and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of the additional language is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that study on speaking multiple languages can be a plus, and I will analyze that through this essay.
From a social standpoint, being monolingual can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that getting familiar with other civilization, as well as the job opportunity, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the influence of speaking the additional language on children. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both being bilingual and promoting cognitive skills apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of conversation science, knowing additional language might increase the consequences of culture shock. Moreover, fundamental aspects of dominant language would relate to this reality that the demerits of forgetting native dialect pertain to the mother tongue language. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of being monolingual is correlated negatively with the dead language. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of acquiring more than one language.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of learning more than one language far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of broadening our horizon prove the significance of promote our public awareness, but also pinpoint career implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1588.0 1207.87684729 131% => OK
No of words: 279.0 242.827586207 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.6917562724 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17480996304 2.71678728327 117% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 139.433497537 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.641577060932 0.580463131201 111% => OK
syllable_count: 506.7 379.143842365 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.0800414449 50.4703680194 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.333333333 104.977214359 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.25 20.9669160288 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229938246947 0.242375264174 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0790102119407 0.0925447433944 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0645069109698 0.071462118173 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132166745458 0.151781067708 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0493213681665 0.0609392437508 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 12.6369458128 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 53.1260098522 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.02 11.5310837438 139% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.55 8.32886699507 127% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 55.0591133005 185% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.