The ability to learn more than one language will be less important in future. Do you agree or disagree?
The importance of Learning multiple languages, which was always debateable, has now become more controversial. The substansial influence of the knowing several langauges has sparked the controversy over the potential impact of this trend recent years. It can be agreed that understanding various languages is more important in future. This essay will elaborate that how learning different languages are beneficial and how it is not.
At the outset, there are numerous reasons why ability to know more than one language will be important in future. The most conspicuous one stem from the fact that having knowledge of many languages will be very useful in upcoming days. As an illustration, for an example, if an English speaker want to spread his business in non-English speaking country. Then language of the host country will help him to do this. Furthermore, such as tourists who love to travel around the world, knowing more than one language would be great for them. By this way, it has more benefits than disadvantages.
Secondly, having familiarity with more than one language has always more importance. Another key justification for upholding this notion is that learning several languages is fruitful in many ways, such as to be aware with the world affairs. Moreover, journalists should be well aware of various languages because it is helpful for them to gather news all around the world. Thus, learning more than one language is helpful in almost every matter. In coming future, it’s importance will increase.
For what has been discussed above, it can be conclude that the impact of knowing more than one language is prominent. The ability to learn several languages will gain more importance in coming years all around the world.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-11-08 | Muhammad Khaleeq | 70 | view |
- In a cashless society, people use more credit cards. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this phenomenon? 77
- Whether the design of the building will have a positive or negative impact on people's life and work? 77
- In most of the education systems, students are assessed by written examinations. Do you think it is a goodidea or not? Give your reasons. 72
- In my countries, the proportion of older people is steadily increasing. Does this trend has more positive or negative effects on society? 85
- The ability to learn more than one language will be less important in future. Do you agree or disagree? 77
Comments
Grammar and spelling errors:
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 326, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...ing various languages is more important in future. This essay will elaborate that how lea...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 104, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...ore than one language will be important in future. The most conspicuous one stem from the...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 218, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ge of many languages will be very useful in upcoming days. As an illustration, fo...
^^
Line 5, column 10, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...enefits than disadvantages. Secondly, having familiarity with more than one la...
^^
Line 5, column 265, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the world affairs. Moreover, journalists should be well aware of various language...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, thus, well, as to, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 10.5418719212 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 8.36945812808 12% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1477.0 1207.87684729 122% => OK
No of words: 286.0 242.827586207 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16433566434 5.00649968141 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74029748024 2.71678728327 101% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 139.433497537 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.534965034965 0.580463131201 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 457.2 379.143842365 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 12.6551724138 134% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.5024630542 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.6954553628 50.4703680194 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 86.8823529412 104.977214359 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8235294118 20.9669160288 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.76470588235 7.25397266985 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.33497536946 94% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 6.9802955665 201% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.47864265525 0.242375264174 197% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.174482251499 0.0925447433944 189% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.110623215734 0.071462118173 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.322048077477 0.151781067708 212% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0369018699096 0.0609392437508 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 12.6369458128 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 53.1260098522 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.9458128079 87% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.35 11.5310837438 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.74 8.32886699507 93% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 55.0591133005 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.3980295567 81% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 65.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 58.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
hi there, I want to know the score report of this essay. waiting for your response. Thanks