In academic studies, grouping students according to academic abilities is good or not good? Give your opinion
Of late, there has been a colossal upsurge among the prodigies discussing the fact the grouping students according to academic scoring is beneficial option for students. Critics, however claim that this practice is some how suitable for students who already have good academic abilities, but ruins one’s future who is struggling for satisfactory academic scores. I, personally believe that later idea is more realistic and worth to believe.
At the out set, there are myriad of arguments associated with the fact that grouping students according to academic abilities greatly influence their final out come. Firstly, the most conspicuous one stem from the fact that in universities and institutes, grouping trend on the basis of academic capabilities is beneficial for top scorers to enhance their abilities in more positive way. However, this trend is not the suitable option for average students, who need proper guideline and academic counselling to build strong career. As a prime example, in well known institutes avoidance of this trend makes their name in top institutes to address the problems of youngsters in their academic life.
On the other hand, another pivotal facet pertaining to this argument is that there is a dire need of maintenance of equality between students in institutes to provide comfortable environment for every student. Therefore, this statement one is sufficient to support my argument.
To recapitulate, foregoing discussion propounds that grouping in institutes has minimum benefits than it’s worst outcomes. Therefore, ideas that will bring benefit would be cordially welcomed.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 216, Rule ID: SOME_HOW[1]
Message: Did you mean 'somehow'?
Suggestion: somehow
...cs, however claim that this practice is some how suitable for students who already have ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 157, Rule ID: OUT_COME[1]
Message: Did you mean 'outcome'?
Suggestion: outcome
...abilities greatly influence their final out come. Firstly, the most conspicuous one stem...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 677, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...to address the problems of youngsters in their academic life. On the other ha...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, so, therefore, well, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1386.0 1207.87684729 115% => OK
No of words: 248.0 242.827586207 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.58870967742 5.00649968141 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96837696647 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88330982489 2.71678728327 106% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 139.433497537 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.608870967742 0.580463131201 105% => OK
syllable_count: 439.2 379.143842365 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.9017489439 50.4703680194 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.0 104.977214359 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5454545455 20.9669160288 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.54545454545 7.25397266985 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.251166303666 0.242375264174 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0833442388968 0.0925447433944 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0754085363719 0.071462118173 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126924682665 0.151781067708 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0929342980174 0.0609392437508 153% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 12.6369458128 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.44 11.5310837438 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.76 8.32886699507 117% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 55.0591133005 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.