In academic studies, grouping students according to academic abilities is good or not good? Give your opinion.
Of late, there has been a colossal upsurge among the prodigies discussing the fact that the trend of student’s grouping according to their academic studies is beneficial or not. I, completely accord this statement and I personally believe that every student should get a chance to learn in improved and beneficial environment. In this essay, I shall highlight some of the main features of this statement before deducing any final conclusion.
At the outset, there are myriad of arguments discussing the fact that grouping of students according to their academic level is beneficial or not for them. Firstly, the most conspicuous one stem from the fact that in institutions, every student has right to avail the chance of seeking quality of education. Therefore, an average student can get a chance to overcome the level of difficulty from an intelligent student. As a prime example, universities or institutions are built to provide quality education to all levels and help students to grasp maximum knowledge from teachers in competitive environment.
Another, pivotal facet pertaining to this argument is that grouping students according to their capabilities could decrease the moral of other students who are hardworking and try to overcome their deficiencies. As a result this practice would provoke discouragement amongst students.
To recapitulate, foregoing discussion propounds that there is a dire need for governments effort to take serious action against these strategies and promote other beneficial trends in universities. Therefore, ideas that will bring benefit should be cordially welcomed.
- Effective learning requires time, comfort and peace so it is impossible to combine study and employment. Study and employment distract one from another. To what extent do you think the statements are realistic? Support your opinion with examples? 88
- In academic studies, grouping students according to academic abilities is good or not good? Give your opinion. 77
- In town and cities the large shopping mall should replace the small local shop Do you agree or disagree 93
- In academic studies, grouping students according to academic abilities is good or not good? Give your opinion. 85
- . Personal Development is the base for professional development and advancing in one’s career. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 101, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...es discussing the fact that the trend of student's grouping according to th...
^^
Line 1, column 117, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e fact that the trend of student's grouping according to their academic stu...
^^
Line 1, column 368, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...nment. In this essay, I shall highlight some of the main features of this statement before ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 212, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...and try to overcome their deficiencies. As a result this practice would provoke di...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, so, therefore, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1371.0 1207.87684729 114% => OK
No of words: 247.0 242.827586207 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.55060728745 5.00649968141 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96437052324 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11173046107 2.71678728327 115% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 139.433497537 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591093117409 0.580463131201 102% => OK
syllable_count: 432.9 379.143842365 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.6157635468 22% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.3609624897 50.4703680194 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.636363636 104.977214359 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4545454545 20.9669160288 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.18181818182 7.25397266985 58% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.162975542861 0.242375264174 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0621686595091 0.0925447433944 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0686176999759 0.071462118173 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0903905720952 0.151781067708 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0549471867599 0.0609392437508 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 12.6369458128 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.21 11.5310837438 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.91 8.32886699507 119% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 55.0591133005 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.