advantages and disadvantages of living in era in which new things are constantly invented.

Essay topics:

advantages and disadvantages of living in era in which new things are constantly invented.

The importance of advantages or disadvantages of living in era which was always debate has now become more controversial with many people claiming that is beneficial while others reject this notion. The substantial of this trend has sparked the controversy over the potential impact in recent years. In my opinion, the former proposition impact in rational. This essay will further elaborate both positive and negative effects of this trend and thus will lead to a logical conclusion.

There are myriad of reasons which will further explain this arguments but the most preponderant one stems from the fact that now days new technology is increasing time by time which is more fine. Another pivotal aspect of this arguments is that 80% people do work on smart phone and they are time save. There are so many type of beneficial new technology. Needless to say, all these merits stand on a good stead.

However, there are some pitfalls that negate these arguments and which can certainly overwhelm the potential influence of this trend but one of the most alarming one is that human can do many task flexibly using their body and simple tools but inventions eventually make them forget that usage their body. Besides, 60% children use to smart phone with this put bad effects on eyes which is not good. Hence, it is apparent why many are against this trend.

According to the arguments aforementioned above, one can reach to a conclusion that the benefits of living in era is best in human life are instrumental indeed. Nevertheless, its potential drawback should not be overlooked either,

Votes
Average: 8 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 486, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...thus will lead to a logical conclusion. There are myriad of reasons which will f...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 56, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...d of reasons which will further explain this arguments but the most preponderant one...
^^^^
Line 3, column 223, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...is more fine. Another pivotal aspect of this arguments is that 80% people do work on...
^^^^
Line 3, column 317, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun type seems to be countable; consider using: 'many types'.
Suggestion: many types
...ne and they are time save. There are so many type of beneficial new technology. Needless ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 188, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun task seems to be countable; consider using: 'many tasks'.
Suggestion: many tasks
... most alarming one is that human can do many task flexibly using their body and simple to...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 329, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...usage their body. Besides, 60% children use to smart phone with this put bad effect...
^^^
Line 7, column 231, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rawback should not be overlooked either,
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, hence, however, if, look, nevertheless, so, thus, while, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.5418719212 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 5.94088669951 202% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 25.0 20.9802955665 119% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1334.0 1207.87684729 110% => OK
No of words: 266.0 242.827586207 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01503759398 5.00649968141 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65812603347 2.71678728327 98% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 139.433497537 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59022556391 0.580463131201 102% => OK
syllable_count: 418.5 379.143842365 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 72.606257575 50.4703680194 144% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.615384615 104.977214359 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4615384615 20.9669160288 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.46153846154 7.25397266985 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.33497536946 131% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.137808954046 0.242375264174 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.043454932339 0.0925447433944 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0629047003405 0.071462118173 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.080372978209 0.151781067708 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0277415348736 0.0609392437508 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 12.6369458128 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.1260098522 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.9458128079 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 11.5310837438 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.32886699507 103% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 55.0591133005 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.