Certain kinds of music promote learning in life. Agree or disagree?
The important of certain kind of music promote learning in life. Which was always debatable has now become more controversial with many people claiming that it is beneficial while other reject this notion. This essay will elaborate both aspects of this trend and this will lead to a logical conclusion.
There are myriad of reason which will further explain this argument but the most preponderant one stems from the fact that all people listen the music and easy complete on their task and enjoy the music. Songs of our brains have a great effect if the songs are good. For example some songs like that are against drunkenness .Another pivotal aspect for this arguments is that furthermore some songs are good. Listening to such songs, people solve their problems and leave their bad actions.
However, there are some pitfalls that a negate this arguments and which can certainly overwhelm the potential influence of this tread but the most alarming is that there are some songs in which weapons and drugs are used. Children listen to such songs, Then they learn the same. As a illustration for example some children have become addicted to drunk by listening to such songs. Besides, because of such songs our society has a very bad effect. Children get out of the way of their parents. Hence, it is apparent why many are against certain kinds of music promote learning in life.
According to the argument aforementioned above, once can reach a conclusion that the benefit of certain kinds of music promote learning in life are instrumental indeed. Nevertheless, the potential drawbacks should not be overlooked either.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 66, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Which” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...kind of music promote learning in life. Which was always debatable has now become mor...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 323, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... songs like that are against drunkenness .Another pivotal aspect for this argument...
^^
Line 2, column 325, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Another
...ongs like that are against drunkenness .Another pivotal aspect for this arguments is th...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 352, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...drunkenness .Another pivotal aspect for this arguments is that furthermore some song...
^^^^
Line 3, column 39, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... However, there are some pitfalls that a negate this arguments and which can certainly ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 48, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
..., there are some pitfalls that a negate this arguments and which can certainly overw...
^^^^
Line 3, column 282, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...uch songs, Then they learn the same. As a illustration for example some children ...
^
Line 4, column 240, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...wbacks should not be overlooked either.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, furthermore, hence, however, if, look, nevertheless, so, then, while, for example, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.5418719212 142% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 20.9802955665 114% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 31.9359605911 94% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1357.0 1207.87684729 112% => OK
No of words: 271.0 242.827586207 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0073800738 5.00649968141 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5029604889 2.71678728327 92% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 139.433497537 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.546125461255 0.580463131201 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 414.9 379.143842365 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6551724138 119% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.3239991832 50.4703680194 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.4666666667 104.977214359 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0666666667 20.9669160288 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.93333333333 7.25397266985 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.33497536946 150% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238600429461 0.242375264174 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112677427643 0.0925447433944 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.205427462795 0.071462118173 287% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178220525183 0.151781067708 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0914518275953 0.0609392437508 150% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 12.6369458128 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 53.1260098522 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.9458128079 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.48 11.5310837438 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.91 8.32886699507 95% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 55.0591133005 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.