Advertising may make people buy something they don’t need or cannot afford, but also, they can convey information to increase their life quality. What is your opinion?
Recently, the phenomenon of the impact of advertisement on buying products and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of getting information is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that excessive purchasing can be a point, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, learning new information by advertisement can provide society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the merits of the effect of a product in the lifestyle, as well as improving the views, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic survey that discovered more than 45% of people get acquainted with usages of devices by advertising. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both enhancing the level of knowledge and commercial advertisements apparently can be seen.
On the other hand, within the realm of psychology, exposure to massive advertisement methods might increase the consequences of fake needs. Moreover, the fundamental aspects of tempting for buying expensive products could relate to this reality that the demerits of exaggerated information about the commercial view. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by UCLA University has asserted that the 35% of American buyers do not need their shopping. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of influencing the way of buys.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the drawbacks of impacting an uncontrolled advertisement on shoppers' minds far outweigh its benefits. Not only do the disadvantages of buying unnecessary products prove the significance of forced induction, but also pinpoint unaffordable purchasing implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 31.9359605911 138% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1631.0 1207.87684729 135% => OK
No of words: 293.0 242.827586207 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.56655290102 5.00649968141 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.3297849075 2.71678728327 123% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 139.433497537 135% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.641638225256 0.580463131201 111% => OK
syllable_count: 515.7 379.143842365 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.7471290203 50.4703680194 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.916666667 104.977214359 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4166666667 20.9669160288 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.25397266985 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.132890746405 0.242375264174 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0411046413001 0.0925447433944 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0193685095786 0.071462118173 27% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0717115054475 0.151781067708 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0126473198937 0.0609392437508 21% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 12.6369458128 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 53.1260098522 57% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.32 11.5310837438 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.49 8.32886699507 126% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 55.0591133005 191% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.