The belching and unauthorized is unacceptable in modern offices. How far do you support the view? Give your response with justification?

Essay topics:

The belching and unauthorized is unacceptable in modern offices. How far do you support the view? Give your response with justification?

Surely there was no time in the history where the lives of people have change more dramatically. A quick reflection on the typical day revels belching and unauthorized is unacceptable one of most promised topic in the contemporary discussion people have always been intrigued to analyze and explain regarding this paragraph.
To begin with, the first and foremost point that it also disturb other and make feel uncomfortable and belching and unauthorized are not acceptable in modern offices because unauthorized people have low the progress and make the disturb in office for example employ after having heavy lunch in afternoon time, release a sudden gas through of his mouth and he will disturb the office.
Secondly, good understanding between employers and employees is important for an organization grows but few employees do unacceptable behavior creates problematic situation. There are various situations which cause and for an employer have to deal with these problems accordingly and effectively. Some of the unauthorized problems such as accessing restricted content make a huge lose for employer. Furthermore, bullying other employees, bad manners, harassment, abusive language, aggressive and many more are some of the problems. From the above it can analyze that employee involved in such activities may also lead to termination.

Votes
Average: 5.5 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-07-15 harpreet hundal 55 view
2019-07-15 Nobal hundal 55 view
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 226, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...d people have low the progress and make the disturb in office for example employ after havi...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 298, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: Some
...e problems accordingly and effectively. Some of the unauthorized problems such as accessing...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 511, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
... language, aggressive and many more are some of the problems. From the above it can analyze...
^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, first, furthermore, may, regarding, second, secondly, so, for example, such as, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.5418719212 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 8.36945812808 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 5.94088669951 67% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 20.9802955665 38% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 31.9359605911 75% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1142.0 1207.87684729 95% => OK
No of words: 207.0 242.827586207 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.51690821256 5.00649968141 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79308509922 3.92707691288 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04373896591 2.71678728327 112% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 139.433497537 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.676328502415 0.580463131201 117% => OK
syllable_count: 366.3 379.143842365 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 4.6157635468 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 12.6551724138 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.5024630542 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 91.7161892743 50.4703680194 182% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.75 104.977214359 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.875 20.9669160288 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 14.625 7.25397266985 202% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.12807881773 73% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 6.9802955665 29% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.109475329984 0.242375264174 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0383508006803 0.0925447433944 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0348862580353 0.071462118173 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0708047155838 0.151781067708 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0149670510162 0.0609392437508 25% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 12.6369458128 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.18 53.1260098522 55% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.9458128079 141% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 11.5310837438 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.3 8.32886699507 112% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 55.0591133005 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.5 9.94827586207 196% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.3980295567 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.