Personal development is the base for professional development. To what extant do you agree?
Surely there has been no time in history where lives of people changed dramatically. A quick reflection on typical day revels professional development has been the one of prominent topics in the contemporary discussion. People have always been intrigued to analyze and explain personal development.
To begin with, professional development can achieve from personal development by motivating themselves. Many companies are appointing for candidates not only by academic performances, moreover they examines the personal abilities like communication skills, performance with team, team developing skills, managing skills. These skills cannot learn in academics students should develop personally.
Secondly, many success people comes from the under developed areas and worked for development of nations. The personal problems in the surroundings and families may inflate them to work hard these personal experiences will help the people to work hard and successful personalities in the society. For example, top most industrialists in India Amana is came from the small ruler area and developed his native village technically after his achievement.
By this it can be concluded, that many people are successful in their career by personal developments and personal observation. In a nutshell, it can tell that, personal development is very essential to develop professionally.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 199, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'they' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'examine'
Suggestion: examine
...by academic performances, moreover they examines the personal abilities like communicati...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 352, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'come'.
Suggestion: come
...p most industrialists in India Amana is came from the small ruler area and developed...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
may, moreover, second, secondly, so, for example, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.5418719212 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 5.94088669951 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 20.9802955665 62% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 31.9359605911 91% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.75862068966 191% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1182.0 1207.87684729 98% => OK
No of words: 201.0 242.827586207 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.88059701493 5.00649968141 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 3.92707691288 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24171255353 2.71678728327 119% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 139.433497537 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.661691542289 0.580463131201 114% => OK
syllable_count: 375.3 379.143842365 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.1728385937 50.4703680194 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.454545455 104.977214359 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2727272727 20.9669160288 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.72727272727 7.25397266985 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.25539013501 0.242375264174 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104028322624 0.0925447433944 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0525579438857 0.071462118173 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154529551314 0.151781067708 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0282129086628 0.0609392437508 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 12.6369458128 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.83 53.1260098522 52% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.9 10.9458128079 127% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.82 11.5310837438 146% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.79 8.32886699507 118% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 55.0591133005 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 55.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.