"Brands that offer discounts and sales dilute their reputation and value."
Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with this statement.
Certain brands are stalwart and maintain a valuable image among consumers. Offering sales or discounts by brands may sometimes devalue their reputations. This essay will discuss the reasons why brands should not sell their products on discounts or sales to keep their reputation valuable.
Some brands create a valuable consumer image in the market. If in case they will sell their products on less amount than its original, it may degrade its image among customers due to many reasons. High end luxury brands, for example, have already created a brand value among buyers. Thus, by seeing the products on discounted price, consumers will take it as a negative thing and the brands will loose its value.
Maintaining brands offer a sense of reliability for quality of products among buyers. Since most of the individuals rely on some particular brands of their choice for some particular items because of its quality rather than its price value. So if the brands will start offering luxury items on discounted price , it will give rise to a feeling of low quality products in buyers. Hence, by doing so the brands automatically start loosing its customers as well as the value in the market.
This essay discussed the reasons how offering items on discounted price will affect the image of brands and might they will loose their customers as well. In my opinion, in order to maintain the reputation and value, brands should not offer their products on discounts and sales.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-03-15 | jyotikumari042 | 55 | view |
| 2017-07-23 | hey_haho | 80 | view |
- Smoking causes cancer. Cigarette companies want to reduce the age from which people can smoke to 12 years old. Governments believe that only adults should be allowed to smoke.Choose which position you most agree with and discuss why you chose that positio 75
- “Vegetarianism is more ethical than eating meat.”Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with this statement. Support your point of view with reasons and/or examples from your own experience or observations. 72
- Some people think that studying from the past teaches us nothing about today's life. Others argue that the history is a valuable source of information.Discuss both views and give your opinion. 75
- The possibility to telecommute, or work from home, is seen as highly desirable by many employees, yet in recent years some big multinational companies have cancelled their telecommuting schemes.What are the advantages and disadvantages of a telecommuting 77
- “The solution to the overpopulation of this planet is education.”Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with this statement. Support your point of view with reasons and/or examples from your own experience or observations. 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 397, Rule ID: LOOSE_LOSE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'lose' (= miss, waste, suffer the loss etc.)?
Suggestion: lose
...as a negative thing and the brands will loose its value. Maintaining brands offer ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 311, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ffering luxury items on discounted price , it will give rise to a feeling of low q...
^^
Line 7, column 125, Rule ID: LOOSE_LOSE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'lose' (= miss, waste, suffer the loss etc.)?
Suggestion: lose
...the image of brands and might they will loose their customers as well. In my opinion,...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, may, so, thus, well, for example, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 10.5418719212 9% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 6.10837438424 213% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 5.94088669951 0% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.75862068966 35% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1234.0 1207.87684729 102% => OK
No of words: 246.0 242.827586207 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0162601626 5.00649968141 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96035189615 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48909832745 2.71678728327 92% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 139.433497537 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.475609756098 0.580463131201 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 371.7 379.143842365 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.0557810796 50.4703680194 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.9230769231 104.977214359 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9230769231 20.9669160288 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.38461538462 7.25397266985 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.224510547124 0.242375264174 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10490181839 0.0925447433944 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0809172093969 0.071462118173 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183274166652 0.151781067708 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0906110137522 0.0609392437508 149% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 12.6369458128 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 53.1260098522 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.9458128079 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 11.5310837438 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.29 8.32886699507 88% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 55.0591133005 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.94827586207 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.