Medical technology is responsible for human life expectancy. To what extent do you agree or disagree.
In today society medical technology has increase the life expectancy of many people throughout the globe. However, there is a conflict notion revolving around this statement. This essay will discuss the reasons why medical advancement is responsible for long life expectancy but at the high financial costs before concluding.
Undoubtedly, with the development in medical world life expectancy of many countries has accelerated drastically. Besides, it has also emerged a hope for a prolonged life in older people especially because even the more dangerous diseases such as cancer, AIDS, etc are also getting treated with the sufficiently advanced medical technologies. In brief, people with these diseases are living longer than earlier because of developed medical technology.
On the contrary, although these advancements have led to prolonged life but it does come up with huge cost. To avail these life saving advancements is not in favor of poor people because they do not have that big amount to pay for their treatments. For instance, a lower income group people can not afford such medical services because of their financial crisis. Therefore, medical advancement is not wholly responsible for longevity in life for all people in society.
This essay has discussed how medical advancement has proved to be a factor in increasing life expectancy of people, however it can not be availed by everyone due to high cost. In my opinion, medical technology is truly responsible for the increase in life expectancy of myriad of people.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-14 | Rafia Jawad | 85 | view |
| 2024-04-25 | Rafia Jawad | 55 | view |
| 2024-01-22 | topraveesh | 88 | view |
| 2023-04-21 | padim30987 | 75 | view |
| 2022-11-13 | fereshteh.r | 77 | view |
- There have been many life changing advances in the last century. Which is the most important invention of the past 100 years the cars or antibiotics?Support your point of view with details from your own point of view. 75
- Most artists earn low salaries and should therefore receive social welfare from governments in order for them to continue their work. Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with this statement. Support your point of view with reasons and exampl 70
- The possibility to telecommute, or work from home, is seen as highly desirable by many employees, yet in recent years some big multinational companies have cancelled their telecommuting schemes.What are the advantages and disadvantages of a telecommuting 77
- Trying to save endangered species from extinction is a waste of valuable resources To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 92
- Effective learning requires time, comfort and peace, so it is impossible to combine study and employment. Study and employment distract one from another. To what extent do you think the statements are realistic? Support your opinion with examples. 75
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 118, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this life' or 'these lives'?
Suggestion: this life; these lives
...t does come up with huge cost. To avail these life saving advancements is not in favor of ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, however, if, so, therefore, for instance, in brief, such as, in my opinion, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 8.36945812808 24% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 5.94088669951 17% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 20.9802955665 67% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1305.0 1207.87684729 108% => OK
No of words: 244.0 242.827586207 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34836065574 5.00649968141 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95227774224 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90303696544 2.71678728327 107% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 139.433497537 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553278688525 0.580463131201 95% => OK
syllable_count: 426.6 379.143842365 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.854858201 50.4703680194 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.75 104.977214359 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3333333333 20.9669160288 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.25 7.25397266985 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.240873046545 0.242375264174 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107310390542 0.0925447433944 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0734223626331 0.071462118173 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160806878955 0.151781067708 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0307554199207 0.0609392437508 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 12.6369458128 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 53.1260098522 80% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 11.5310837438 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.32886699507 104% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 55.0591133005 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.94827586207 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.