Cashless society is becoming a reality. More and more people are using credit cards for payment, and less people use cash. How realistic do you think to achieve cashless society? What are the benefits or problems of this phenomenon?
Nowadays, it is impossible to denied that technology is developing in an extraordinary speed/modern technology has totally changed our way of spending. Recently, the topic about cashless city draws attention from the public/cashless city becomes a hot topic of discussion among all population. This essay will elaborate the reality of cashless society and pros and cons of this phenomenon.
To commence with, I believe that cashless city will be pervasive in all developed and developing countries within a few decades. Everyone has one or more smart phone and plenty of credit cards now, and they are all available for paying. When the privacy and convenience of cashless paying improve, more and more people will use them instead of using cash. For example, apple pay and credit card are available in many stores in developed countries such as Australia. Hence, with the advertising and education of this technology, cashless city will be popularised in more countries soon.
Secondly, I want to explore the advantages and disadvantages of this trend. It is irrefutable that it is so convenience to use credit card to pay instead of cash. For instance, you only need a second to pay in credit card in a supermarket while it may take more than a minute to pay in cash. Moreover, it is also safer as people don’t need to carry a huge amount of cash in their wallet. However, privacy and cybercrime are problems that people should be aware. Paying everything digitally means companies like bank can track every action and expenditure of you, it may be a privacy problem. In addition, it also means cybercrime will be rising as most people use phones or card to pay. To give an example, your bank account or credit card are more likely to be stolen.
In conclusion, although I think that cashless city will be reality soon, citizens and government should pay attention to the benefits and problems of this phenomenon and try to avoid the problem.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, however, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, while, as to, for example, for instance, i think, in addition, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.5418719212 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 6.10837438424 213% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 18.0 8.36945812808 215% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 20.9802955665 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 31.9359605911 138% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1623.0 1207.87684729 134% => OK
No of words: 329.0 242.827586207 135% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93313069909 5.00649968141 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 3.92707691288 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82588148966 2.71678728327 104% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 139.433497537 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.507598784195 0.580463131201 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 523.8 379.143842365 138% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 4.6157635468 217% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 12.6551724138 134% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.1407310432 50.4703680194 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 95.4705882353 104.977214359 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3529411765 20.9669160288 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.47058823529 7.25397266985 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 2.75862068966 217% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.36815365605 0.242375264174 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115772518066 0.0925447433944 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0768798260988 0.071462118173 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.207696513785 0.151781067708 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0371555062284 0.0609392437508 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 12.6369458128 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.1260098522 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.9458128079 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 11.5310837438 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.89 8.32886699507 95% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 55.0591133005 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.94827586207 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.