In a cashless society, people use more credit cards. Cashless society seems to be a reality, and how realistic do you think it might be? What are the advantages and disadvantages of this phenomenon?
Recently, the phenomenon of cashless societies and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matters of using credit cards are highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to conceive that sophisticated people can be a plus, and I will investigate that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, a cashless society can provide the society with noticeable effects, which are rooted in the fact that merits, as well as advantages of cost-effective means, are visible. According to my own experience, I performed an academic experiment that discovered the importance of using credit cards. Hence, beneficial ramifications of efficient persons are remarkable.
From a scientific point of view, an inefficient society can supply the community with negative impacts, which are related to the reality that demerits of costly methods are crucial. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by an elite university described conservative people. Thus, predicted outcomes of using cash are noticeable.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of cashless societies far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of using credit cards prove the significance of economical people, but also pinpoint possible implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-05 | Alireza.r.68 | 88 | view |
| 2019-06-01 | payamesp2 | 88 | view |
- Government should allocate sources prior to the technology research, do you agree or disagree? Give your own experience and examples. 88
- Which areas of concern should governments allocate funds to? Climate change, education, or public health? Explain your idea with examples. 88
- Effective learning requires time, comfort and peace so it is impossible to combine study and employment. Study and employment distract one from another. To what extent do you think the statements are realistic? Support your opinion with examples? 88
- Some people think that younger employees often have more skills, knowledge and motivation than the old employees. To what extent do you agree with it? Use your experience. 80
- Certain type of music affects young children’s learning. Researchers have researched on it. Some people agree and some disagree. What is your opinion? 88
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 31.9359605911 81% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1244.0 1207.87684729 103% => OK
No of words: 218.0 242.827586207 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.70642201835 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84250218741 3.92707691288 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.2301298337 2.71678728327 119% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 139.433497537 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.660550458716 0.580463131201 114% => OK
syllable_count: 400.5 379.143842365 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.7611477634 50.4703680194 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.090909091 104.977214359 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8181818182 20.9669160288 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.25397266985 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21886506383 0.242375264174 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0688646881068 0.0925447433944 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0475646059559 0.071462118173 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120853834876 0.151781067708 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0545037848566 0.0609392437508 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 12.6369458128 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 53.1260098522 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.9458128079 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.84 11.5310837438 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.95 8.32886699507 131% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 55.0591133005 160% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.