Certain kinds of music promote learning in children life. Do you agree or disagree?
One of the most conspicuous trends of today’s world is a colossal upsurge in a number of people who believe that music is a waste of time, it is not either way helpful for promoting student’s learning. There is widespread worry that this will only lead to a myriad of concerns for learners. In my opinion, this apprehension is unwarranted and so should be rejected.
There are number of arguments in favour of my stance. The most preponderant one is that music is considered as a part of the human soul, so it should be made essential for children to learn some kinds of music. Not only can students improve their outlook of the life with enhancing different key skills like creativity, positivity and sociability, but also they can learn to work in a team while they go for music classes. Needless to say, all these merits stand students in good stead as far as learning is concerned.
Another pivotal aspect of the promoting learning by music is a waste of time because it keeps children to away from grasping something from books because listening to music will start them to hate theory which is most important part of students’ learning. Besides, courses like mathematics and physics are highly required fully concentration and time for practice that is impossible to manage if learners keep listing to music.
In view of the arguments outlined above one can conclude that benefits of the listening to music for children are indeed too great to ignore.
- Whether design of building will have a positive or negative impact on people's life and work? 80
- Some people think that teaching methodology in the modern classroom should be based on experimental learning. While others believe that traditional approach is still the best.To what extent do you agree or disagree with the opinion. 85
- Certain kinds of music promote learning in children life. Do you agree or disagree? 80
- Some people think that teaching methodology in the modern classroom should be based on experimental learning. While others believe that traditional approach is still the best.To what extent do you agree or disagree with the opinion. 85
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, if, look, so, while, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.5418719212 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 31.9359605911 122% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.75862068966 17% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1226.0 1207.87684729 102% => OK
No of words: 252.0 242.827586207 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86507936508 5.00649968141 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81083504511 2.71678728327 103% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 139.433497537 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575396825397 0.580463131201 99% => OK
syllable_count: 383.4 379.143842365 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.5024630542 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 64.8027777182 50.4703680194 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.6 104.977214359 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2 20.9669160288 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.4 7.25397266985 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192667225505 0.242375264174 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0663561341041 0.0925447433944 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0627320600694 0.071462118173 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110806712532 0.151781067708 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0512103919633 0.0609392437508 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 12.6369458128 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 53.1260098522 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 11.5310837438 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.32886699507 100% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 55.0591133005 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.3980295567 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.