Cheap overseas travel does more damage than good.
One of the most conspicuous trends of today's world is colossal upsurge in the utilization of cheap traveling packages. There are some people who disregard this phenomenon. This essay will discuss all the concerns by analyzing the significant points.
There are myriad of arguments in supporting this stance. The most preponderant one is that low budgeted packages allows everyone to enjoy traveling destination throughout the world. In addition, another pivotal aspect of this argument is that due to work and home stress, most of the people couldn't get a chance to visit wonderful destinations nearby. On the other hand, it brings more money to marketing teams, traveling agents, hotels and restaurants, etc. hence visiting country get more economic benefits. There by, it clearly validates the aforementioned reasons.
Those who are against low cost traveling have a different perspective. Firstly, it is claimed that due to budgeted traveling it causes rush in every popular destination. It can also be taken into account that due to low class individuals they come and deteriorate the lavishness of beautiful sceneries of those places.
After taking all these points in consideration, without a shadow of doubt, I am inclined to believe that budgeted packages will opens the door for middle class and lower middle class people to travel and discover the natural beauty of the world.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 292, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...ork and home stress, most of the people couldnt get a chance to visit wonderful destina...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 129, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'open'
Suggestion: open
... to believe that budgeted packages will opens the door for middle class and lower mid...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, hence, if, so, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.5418719212 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1177.0 1207.87684729 97% => OK
No of words: 221.0 242.827586207 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3257918552 5.00649968141 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85565412703 3.92707691288 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85135379495 2.71678728327 105% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 139.433497537 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.628959276018 0.580463131201 108% => OK
syllable_count: 365.4 379.143842365 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.5024630542 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 54.4731626013 50.4703680194 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.5384615385 104.977214359 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 20.9669160288 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.15384615385 7.25397266985 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.114299190002 0.242375264174 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0392935001991 0.0925447433944 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0421636076088 0.071462118173 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0626146077122 0.151781067708 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0210093459451 0.0609392437508 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 12.6369458128 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 53.1260098522 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.9458128079 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 11.5310837438 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.32886699507 103% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 55.0591133005 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.94827586207 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.3980295567 85% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 72.2222222222 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 65.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.