Cities are expending and government should focus on building factors better network for public transport rather than building roads for vehicle. Do you agree or not?

Essay topics:

Cities are expending and government should focus on building factors better network for public transport rather than building roads for vehicle. Do you agree or not?

One of the most controversial issues today relates to how government should encourage people to use public transport instead of using private vehicles. I firmly agree with the statement above. I feel this way for two reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.

I feel strongly that massive traffic can be the primary road for people. The reason for this is that impact ecology can play an important role in society. In addition, money spent can be a major aspect that relates to society these days, so people must pay close attention to it. For example, 70 percent of income spent on communicating through cars is undoubtedly the most accepted expenses in country.

I feel just as convinced that air pollution has profound impacting environment on planet. I often argue that in fact the important impact on ecology must not be overlooked because pollution may affect diseases increased. Furthermore, modern will effect large on the world. For instance, people in country would prefer nation development.

In conclusion, promoting the public transportation by a government rather spending massive money behind building roads.
It has now been shown that not only can traffic on road influence but air pollution also can too. It is expected that public transportation will continue to increase in future.

Votes
Average: 5.5 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-06-12 chander singh 72 view
2018-08-09 Deborajimbi 55 view
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ill explore in the following essay. I feel strongly that massive traffic can ...
^
Line 5, column 247, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[6]
Message: Did you mean 'affect'?
Suggestion: affect
...ses increased. Furthermore, modern will effect large on the world. For instance, peopl...
^^^^^^
Line 8, column 167, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...ransportation will continue to increase in future.
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, look, may, so, for example, for instance, i feel, in addition, in conclusion, in fact

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.5418719212 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 6.10837438424 213% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 1.0 8.36945812808 12% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 31.9359605911 81% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 5.75862068966 243% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1110.0 1207.87684729 92% => OK
No of words: 214.0 242.827586207 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18691588785 5.00649968141 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82475343497 3.92707691288 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81919415932 2.71678728327 104% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 139.433497537 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.640186915888 0.580463131201 110% => OK
syllable_count: 340.2 379.143842365 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.5024630542 73% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.3726775708 50.4703680194 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.2857142857 104.977214359 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.2857142857 20.9669160288 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.78571428571 7.25397266985 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.12807881773 121% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192438732205 0.242375264174 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0603095846079 0.0925447433944 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0561558559247 0.071462118173 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109117358488 0.151781067708 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0624443043906 0.0609392437508 102% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 12.6369458128 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 53.1260098522 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.9458128079 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.23 11.5310837438 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.32886699507 105% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 55.0591133005 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.94827586207 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.3980295567 77% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.