As cities expand some people claim governments should look forward creating better networks of public transportation available for everyone rather than building more roads for vehicle owning population What s your opinion Give some examples or experience

Essay topics:

As cities expand, some people claim governments should look forward creating better networks of public transportation available for everyone rather than building more roads for vehicle owning population. What’s your opinion? Give some examples or experience to support

Although such topics will never yield a consensual agreement a dilogue on governments intiation for city sides can lead to thought-provoking discussions. my view is that irrespective of numerous arguments that exists on either sides of the agreement governments should bring more initiation on public transportation and networks works which can communicate in fastest way. through the course of this essay, my point of view considering both the sides of the argument with an explanation. Firstly, Government instead of approving more private transports they should bring the public or mass transports which can reduce traffic and air pollution. many new facilities like metropolitan trains and standardised buses should be broughten up by the democracy. nowadays we find that in a family there are two to three care standing whereas they can reduce it. Secondly, People can ride cycles to their near shops, public should understand of the consequences of producing pollution which can cause climatic change. people can also walk alternate of using transports or they can go with ecofriendly transports like battery cars and bikes which zero percentage non pollutant I see that there is potential evidence is provided hence, people shoul also co-operate with the by using ecofriendly vehicles consequently government should also provide new projects by providig standardiesd buses and metro trains which can carry huge amount of public ratio.

Votes
Average: 5.5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 155, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: My
... lead to thought-provoking discussions. my view is that irrespective of numerous a...
^^
Line 1, column 358, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'in the fastest'.
Suggestion: in the fastest
...nd networks works which can communicate in fastest way. through the course of this essay, ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 374, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Through
...s which can communicate in fastest way. through the course of this essay, my point of v...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 646, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Many
...h can reduce traffic and air pollution. many new facilities like metropolitan trains...
^^^^
Line 1, column 755, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Nowadays
...hould be broughten up by the democracy. nowadays we find that in a family there are two ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 1009, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: People
...lution which can cause climatic change. people can also walk alternate of using transp...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, firstly, hence, second, secondly, so, whereas

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.5418719212 47% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 6.10837438424 246% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 20.9802955665 67% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 31.9359605911 94% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.75862068966 208% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1219.0 1207.87684729 101% => OK
No of words: 223.0 242.827586207 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.466367713 5.00649968141 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86434787811 3.92707691288 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01825370311 2.71678728327 111% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 139.433497537 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.632286995516 0.580463131201 109% => OK
syllable_count: 367.2 379.143842365 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.65517241379 27% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 12.6551724138 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.5024630542 132% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 102.282390958 50.4703680194 203% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 152.375 104.977214359 145% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.875 20.9669160288 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.25397266985 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 1.0 4.12807881773 24% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 6.0 5.33497536946 112% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.138177408438 0.242375264174 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0607382966355 0.0925447433944 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0459196632351 0.071462118173 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138177408438 0.151781067708 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0609392437508 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.3 12.6369458128 145% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 53.1260098522 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 11.5310837438 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.72 8.32886699507 117% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 55.0591133005 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.3980295567 123% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.