Recently, the phenomenon of improving the transport system and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of transportation development is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that public transportation can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, building an advanced transport system can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that merits of convenience in traveling, as well as declining the traffic, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic research which discovered the relationship between investing in the transport system and saving time. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both the public vehicles and reducing crowded cities apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, the attention of the government on public transportation might increase the consequences of building no more roads. Moreover, fundamental aspects of ignoring roads expansion could relate to this reality that the demerits of loss of space for more vehicles pertain to making traffics. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of spending more money on transporting system is correlated negatively with less access to different destinations. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of public transportation development.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of improving the transport system far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of the subway system prove the significance of time management, but also pinpoint saving money implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 31.9359605911 122% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.75862068966 226% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1649.0 1207.87684729 137% => OK
No of words: 290.0 242.827586207 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.68620689655 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.30266530207 2.71678728327 122% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 139.433497537 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.620689655172 0.580463131201 107% => OK
syllable_count: 513.9 379.143842365 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.7902680702 50.4703680194 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.416666667 104.977214359 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1666666667 20.9669160288 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.16386903629 0.242375264174 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0558160094724 0.0925447433944 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0359403346754 0.071462118173 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0881114422564 0.151781067708 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0646122177099 0.0609392437508 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 12.6369458128 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 53.1260098522 57% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.02 11.5310837438 139% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.33 8.32886699507 124% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 55.0591133005 183% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.