Recently, the phenomenon of improving the transport system by the government has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the advantage of a developed network is highly beneficial, the disadvantage of such an issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I highly believe that road construction can be a plus, and I will investigate that throughout this essay. From a social standpoint, making public transport networks can provide societies with noticeable effects that are rooted in the fact that merits, as well as advantages of convenient travelling, are crucial. According to my own experience, I performed an academic experiment that discovered the relationship between replacing old transport systems and reducing air pollution. Thus, the beneficial ramifications of facilitating transportation in cities are visible. From a scientific point of view, building more public transportation systems can provide the community with negative impacts that are related to the reality that the demerits of unsafe roads for private cars are remarkable. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university described the role of investing in transportation infrastructure. Hence, the predicted outcomes of balancing the private and public transport systems are noticeable. To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of having advanced transportation systems far outweigh the drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of vehicle convenience for commuters prove the significance of advanced transporting systems, but also pinpoint possible implications.
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 31.9359605911 94% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.75862068966 191% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1467.0 1207.87684729 121% => OK
No of words: 249.0 242.827586207 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.89156626506 5.00649968141 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97237131171 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.41628058696 2.71678728327 126% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 139.433497537 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.63453815261 0.580463131201 109% => OK
syllable_count: 464.4 379.143842365 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.3708771293 50.4703680194 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.363636364 104.977214359 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6363636364 20.9669160288 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.25397266985 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 1.0 4.12807881773 24% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168350018416 0.242375264174 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0592695686091 0.0925447433944 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0327348455178 0.071462118173 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168350018416 0.151781067708 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0609392437508 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 12.6369458128 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 23.77 53.1260098522 45% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.9458128079 141% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.18 11.5310837438 149% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.88 8.32886699507 131% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 55.0591133005 176% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 31.9359605911 94% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.75862068966 191% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1467.0 1207.87684729 121% => OK
No of words: 249.0 242.827586207 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.89156626506 5.00649968141 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97237131171 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.41628058696 2.71678728327 126% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 139.433497537 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.63453815261 0.580463131201 109% => OK
syllable_count: 464.4 379.143842365 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.3708771293 50.4703680194 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.363636364 104.977214359 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6363636364 20.9669160288 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.25397266985 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 1.0 4.12807881773 24% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168350018416 0.242375264174 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0592695686091 0.0925447433944 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0327348455178 0.071462118173 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168350018416 0.151781067708 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0609392437508 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 12.6369458128 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 23.77 53.1260098522 45% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.9458128079 141% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.18 11.5310837438 149% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.88 8.32886699507 131% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 55.0591133005 176% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.