As cities expanding, some people claim governments should look forward creating better networks of public transportation available for everyone rather than building more roads for vehicle owning population. What’s your opinion? Give some examples or exp

Essay topics:

As cities expanding, some people claim governments should look forward creating better networks of public transportation available for everyone rather than building more roads for vehicle owning population. What’s your opinion? Give some examples or experience to support.

These days, there is an ongoing discussion among people that the governments should concentrate more on expanding the public transportation facilities rather than adding more roads. Although some people believe that building a strong public transport system is the priority over building roads, there are a number of people who hold an opposite view. This essay will discuss why we need a better public transportation network over building more roads.

There are several reasons why I support building a better public transport system. The first and foremost reason is that public transports are always economic and affordable. In addition, the public mode of transport is always efficient and environment-friendly. For instance, 20 people traveling on a single bus is always efficient compared to 20 people driving their own vehicles, in terms of fuel usage and pollution.

However, some people claim that the government should concentrate on building more roads. The main problem is that if we do not have a good network of public transport, people will be forced to use their own vehicles. This will increase traffic. In addition, more vehicles mean excessive fuel usage and high pollution.

This essay argued that governments should focus on building a better network of public transport systems rather than roads. In my opinion, the public transportation system of a country plays a major role in its development and is a good means of giving great infrastructure and facilities to the taxpayers.

Votes
Average: 5.5 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-01-12 Yuli 77 view
2023-01-12 Yuli 77 view
2022-11-04 fereshteh.r 85 view
2022-11-04 fereshteh.r 55 view
2022-11-04 fereshteh.r 88 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user topraveesh :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 320, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...xcessive fuel usage and high pollution. This essay argued that governments shoul...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, so, for instance, in addition, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 31.9359605911 72% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.75862068966 191% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1274.0 1207.87684729 105% => OK
No of words: 239.0 242.827586207 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33054393305 5.00649968141 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93187294222 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98484468715 2.71678728327 110% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 139.433497537 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.510460251046 0.580463131201 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 377.1 379.143842365 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.2027647476 50.4703680194 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.0 104.977214359 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3846153846 20.9669160288 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.92307692308 7.25397266985 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.330929934405 0.242375264174 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124530669565 0.0925447433944 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0750334477084 0.071462118173 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.208286240293 0.151781067708 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0366013508196 0.0609392437508 60% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 12.6369458128 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.1260098522 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.9458128079 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 11.5310837438 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.32886699507 94% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 55.0591133005 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.94827586207 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.5123152709 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.