As cities expanding, some people claim governments should look forward creating better networks of public transportation available for everyone rather than building more roads for vehicle owning population. What’s your opinion? Give some examples or experience to support.
Nowadays, whether the government should focus on the public transport system or should construct more roads for the population with vehicles has attracted numerous controversies and drawn the attention of the general public. I am more inclined towards the government should consummate the current public transport network due to environmental and traffic congestion point of view.
Global warming has become the most serious problem for the whole world. The only way to solve it, is to reduce the carbon dioxide emission level and undoubtedly, automobiles are emitting a considerable amount of carbon dioxide. The government should dedicate itself to develop a better public transport system and encourage more citizens to commute on public transport and this will certainly reduce a large portion of air pollution and decelerate the process of global warming.
In suburban areas, the traffic is usually congested during peak hours and it is due to the high volumes of vehicles. If the government build more roads, the number of vehicles would also increase therefore, traffic jams cannot be resolved. The problem can be solved only if the government creates a better public transport system which will effectively divert the driving population. This will improve the efficiency and reduce the traffic congestion.
In conclusion, I held the view that the government should concentrate on developing a better public transport system for these reasons, it will slow down global warming and it will reduce the traffic jam. To address this issue, the government and society should make a concerted effort to solve it.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 210, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...oversies and drawn the attention of the general public. I am more inclined towards the governm...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, therefore, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.5418719212 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 6.10837438424 229% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 8.36945812808 131% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 5.94088669951 34% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 20.9802955665 62% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 31.9359605911 72% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 5.75862068966 243% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1371.0 1207.87684729 114% => OK
No of words: 254.0 242.827586207 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39763779528 5.00649968141 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76593506807 2.71678728327 102% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 139.433497537 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.543307086614 0.580463131201 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 417.6 379.143842365 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 6.0 1.56157635468 384% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.66890392 50.4703680194 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.636363636 104.977214359 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0909090909 20.9669160288 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.45454545455 7.25397266985 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232134991362 0.242375264174 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0887151929489 0.0925447433944 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0726819389871 0.071462118173 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154850301208 0.151781067708 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.060773177075 0.0609392437508 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 12.6369458128 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 53.1260098522 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.34 11.5310837438 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.32886699507 107% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 55.0591133005 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.