Companies can progress by good communion and collaboration between the employers and staff. Good incentives, individualistic approach, recognition and a pat on the back for the successful completion of a project can enhance the enthusiasm and can lead the company to visionary targets and goals.
Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with this statement.
Support your point of view with reasons and/or examples from your experience and observations.
Corporations can be succesful through better relatiosnhip between employers and employees. Supplementing bonuses, personal treatment, giving notice and cheering up for the accomplishment of a task can improve enthusiasm and can direct the business towards achieving their objectives. In my poiny of view, I strongly assent to the foregoing statement for the reasons that it can increase the people's self-esteem and can reduce work stress.
To begin with, certain individuals are always looking for a company that would make him grow personally and career wise. Part of this growth is to escalate his morals by gaining positive feedbacks from his superiors. Consequently, confidence can be therefore be attained whenever he will be a finishing a job assigned to him. To illustrate, the rank and file employee is given a recognition once in a while everytime he is able to exceed the required production output for the day. He would therefore feel high esteem within himself and be ready for another day's volume target.
Furthermore, with the mentioned behavior and good working relationship among the workforce, people can be able to feel happy about their work. As a result, they can alleviate stress working conditions due to the positive environment they are in. This is exemplified by the constant tapping of the management regarding their achievement and meeting of goals. Individuals can forget about difficulty of their task when they are provided with much appreciation and value by their boss. For example, the President of ABC Corporation is often visiting his workers and give optimistic approach to them while at work.
To conclude, industries today need a short evaluation of what their employees' needs. These include boosting their confidence towards work and reducing their undesirable moods.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-05-01 | Fiona Joanna Cruz | 90 | view |
- How widely do you think the problem spreads that people spend too much time on work than their personal life and experience time shortage? What problems will it cause? 68
- Raising the price of the oil will solve the world's environmental problems. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 89
- Some people think that international car-free days are effective way of reducing air pollution. Others think there are some other ways. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 52
- Many childhood diseases can now be prevented through the use of vaccines.Should parents be made by law to immunize their children against common diseases or should individuals have the right to choose not to immunize their children? 80
- •Some countries encourage teenagers to have part-time job and see it as a good thing, while others disagree. Give your opinion and explain both views. 72
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 559, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'days'' or 'day's'?
Suggestion: days'; day's
...within himself and be ready for another days volume target. Furthermore, with th...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, furthermore, if, look, regarding, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.5418719212 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 6.10837438424 213% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 12.0 8.36945812808 143% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 5.94088669951 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 20.9802955665 138% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.75862068966 226% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1531.0 1207.87684729 127% => OK
No of words: 285.0 242.827586207 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37192982456 5.00649968141 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97533515212 2.71678728327 110% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 139.433497537 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.635087719298 0.580463131201 109% => OK
syllable_count: 467.1 379.143842365 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6551724138 119% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.4402596607 50.4703680194 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 102.066666667 104.977214359 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 20.9669160288 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.66666666667 7.25397266985 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 6.9802955665 172% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205122264613 0.242375264174 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0653260952111 0.0925447433944 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0592507102585 0.071462118173 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116917166016 0.151781067708 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0962762260746 0.0609392437508 158% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 12.6369458128 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.1260098522 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.9458128079 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 11.5310837438 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.34 8.32886699507 112% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 55.0591133005 156% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.