'Computer technology has had more of a negative than a positive impact on society. How far do you agree with this statement?

Essay topics:

'Computer technology has had more of a negative than a positive impact on society. How far do you agree with this statement?

Computers are one of the best innovations of the last century. Extensive use of computers in every field has affected everyone's life in direct or indirect ways. Some people blame that computer technology has more negative effects on people than positive effects. In this Essay I shall discuss that why computer's negative impact on society outweighs the positive impact on society.

First and formost, it has made people lazy. With the advent of computer technology, most of the work has become automated, for example, vaccume cleaners, washing machines, automated cars and so on, a wide range of machines are available for most of the household, industrial and agricultural tasks. These automations have made life easy and hence less physical work is required which directly leads to a sedentary life.

Secondly, it has adverse effect on health and lifestyle. Most people have addiction to these technologies such as game consoles, mobile phones and internet, for instance, as per a survey, 40% of indian kids are suffering from eye related problem because of playing games on mobile phone and computers. Prolong usage and harmful radiowaves of these devices are making people sick.

In this essay, we discussed how computer technology is making people lazy and sick. In other words humans are becoming the slave of the technology. Hence, I strongly agree that computer technology has had more of a negative than a positive impact on society.

Votes
Average: 7.2 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2018-12-14 cur_zii 77 view
2018-06-11 manish123 88 view
2018-06-11 thanuja 77 view
2018-04-26 rishabhgzb 72 view
2018-04-26 rishabhgzb 72 view
Essay Categories

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, hence, if, second, secondly, so, for example, for instance, such as, in other words

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.5418719212 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 6.10837438424 16% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 5.94088669951 67% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 20.9802955665 62% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 31.9359605911 88% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.75862068966 35% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1218.0 1207.87684729 101% => OK
No of words: 234.0 242.827586207 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20512820513 5.00649968141 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91114542567 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66061937592 2.71678728327 98% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 139.433497537 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615384615385 0.580463131201 106% => OK
syllable_count: 403.2 379.143842365 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.74607541 50.4703680194 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.6923076923 104.977214359 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.9669160288 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.92307692308 7.25397266985 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 6.9802955665 43% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 2.75862068966 290% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.288264765456 0.242375264174 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105059049655 0.0925447433944 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.152864317976 0.071462118173 214% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192164034538 0.151781067708 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.17259789302 0.0609392437508 283% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 12.6369458128 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 53.1260098522 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.64 11.5310837438 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.19 8.32886699507 110% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 55.0591133005 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 72.2222222222 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 65.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.