In Modern life, people want more adventure in their life, so that, they go generally to adventures place to do numerous activities like skiing, bungee jumping and parachute diving etc. But actually, they are dangerous activities. I personally feel that it should be done in the presence of experts, rather than, stop it. In subsequent paragraphs, I will discuss my point of view in support of these activities.
To begin with the adventures, nowadays people go out for adventure to get relax from their busy life schedule. Most of the time, they choose different activities like skiing and bungee jumping. But the problems arise why they perform these activities without any practice or without any expert guidance. Sometimes people face major physical damages and in some cases, they also died; Nevertheless, I feel that it should be supported because this problem can be solved out by giving a proper training session under an expert teacher. For example, before doing sea diving activity, proper training is provided for 2-3 days then they allow to do that.
Secondly, if we will not support these activities, then so many people that depend on these activities become unemployed. For example, Northern part of India like Uttarakhand and Himachal Pradesh, their economies mostly depend on tourists and these activities. We cannot ban or stop it, otherwise, adverse effect will be seen in these areas.
In the nutshell, the foregoing discussion propounds the view that activities like skiing and bungee jumping, etc. should be supported if proper guidance is provided to person.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 638, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'doing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'allow' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: doing
...s provided for 2-3 days then they allow to do that. Secondly, if we will not suppo...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, then, for example, i feel, in some cases, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.5418719212 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 20.9802955665 153% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1336.0 1207.87684729 111% => OK
No of words: 256.0 242.827586207 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21875 5.00649968141 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6554111727 2.71678728327 98% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 139.433497537 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.609375 0.580463131201 105% => OK
syllable_count: 414.0 379.143842365 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 4.6157635468 195% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.9664917886 50.4703680194 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.4285714286 104.977214359 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2857142857 20.9669160288 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.28571428571 7.25397266985 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172037269275 0.242375264174 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0637064606742 0.0925447433944 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0669766795993 0.071462118173 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126485016398 0.151781067708 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0643799917977 0.0609392437508 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 12.6369458128 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.1260098522 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.9458128079 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 11.5310837438 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.32886699507 100% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 55.0591133005 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 72.2222222222 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 65.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.