The design of buildings affect either positively or negatively on people’s life and work. Do you agree or disagree? Give your opinion and give some your experience and examples.
With the fast-changing development of technology and economy, our cities are expanding. The design of buildings has become a heated debate among people. Some people claim that it affects positively on people’s life and work, while others believe it affects negatively. From my point of view, I am in agreement with it affects positively on people’s life and work. My reasons and examples are given below.
First of all, it is undeniable that the design of buildings provides individual a healthier living environment. To be specific, some materials people used in building were harmful to both children and adults, such as paint which is smelly and harmful to individual's physical health. Thanks to the innovation in design of building, with using high quality materials people’s living standard has been improved. The latest Oxford research shows that the new green paint made from organic materials is completely harmless to human.
Apart from that, it should also be taken into account that the design of building provides employees a more comfortable working environment. To illustrate, the reasonable space design and the application of technology provides employees a more comfortable and functional working environment. For instance, a report from New York Time shows that an auto color-changing glass has been installed in SoHo building in Beijing, and the glass can adjust the lighting of the space automatically according to the sunshine outside.
To put it into a nutshell, a conclusion can be made that the design of building affects positively on people’s life and work, because it provides people not only a healthier living environment but also a more comfortable working environment.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-08 | jackalliubuyi | 77 | view |
| 2019-07-08 | jackalliubuyi | 80 | view |
- Nowadays more and more credit cards are used instead of cash. How realistic is it to have the idea of a cashless society? What are the benefits and shortcomings? Discuss. 85
- The design of buildings affect either positively or negatively on people’s life and work. Do you agree or disagree? Give your opinion and give some your experience and examples. 80
- Nowadays more and more credit cards are used instead of cash. How realistic is it to have the idea of a cashless society? What are the benefits and shortcomings? Discuss. 80
- Large shopping malls are replacing local small shops, some people think it is a positive development. Do you agree or not? 77
- Advertising not only make people buy something they don t need or cannot afford but also they can convey information to increase their life quality What s your opinion 49
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, while, apart from, for instance, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 8.36945812808 131% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1460.0 1207.87684729 121% => OK
No of words: 269.0 242.827586207 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.42750929368 5.00649968141 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08465523387 2.71678728327 114% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 139.433497537 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.520446096654 0.580463131201 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 448.2 379.143842365 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 5.0 1.56157635468 320% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.304749818 50.4703680194 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.307692308 104.977214359 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6923076923 20.9669160288 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.15384615385 7.25397266985 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233417090172 0.242375264174 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0890431541858 0.0925447433944 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0865242297649 0.071462118173 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160324531165 0.151781067708 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0773653838783 0.0609392437508 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 12.6369458128 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 53.1260098522 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 11.5310837438 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.32886699507 102% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 55.0591133005 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.94827586207 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.