Some people argue that young people should concentrate on study or work. Some people think it is better to put energy in activities designed to broaden their experience, such as international travel and volunteering. Support with examples or cases.
Recently, the phenomenon of concentrating on the study and work by young people and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matters of designed activities are highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to conceive that broadening experiences can be a plus, and I will investigate that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, concentrating on the study and work can provide the society with noticeable effects, which are rooted in the fact that merits, as well as advantages of hard-working young people, are visible. According to my own experience, I performed an academic experiment that discovered the importance of experienced students. Thus, beneficial ramifications of useful activities are remarkable.
From a scientific point of view, broadening experiences can supply the community with negative impacts, which are related to the reality that demerits of unuseful activities are crucial. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by an elite university described international travels. Hence, predicted outcomes of inefficient volunteers are noticeable.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of concentrating on the study and work by young people far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of valuable activities prove the significance of broadening an experience, but also pinpoint possible implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-22 | Alireza.r.68 | 88 | view |
| 2019-10-07 | mndpsngh21 | 80 | view |
| 2019-10-07 | mndpsngh21 | 77 | view |
| 2019-08-31 | Ekta shah | 72 | view |
| 2019-08-08 | daniellima126 | 11 | view |
- student marks 88
- Nowadays TV has become an essential part of life, and a bridge to spread news and awareness and for some it acts like a companion. What is your opinion about this? 80
- Which areas of concern should governments allocate funds to? Climate change, education, or public health? Explain your idea with examples. 88
- Medical technology can increase life expectancy Is it a blessing or curse 80
- Some universities deduct marks from students' works if given in late, what are your views and what action will you recommend 85
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1349.0 1207.87684729 112% => OK
No of words: 233.0 242.827586207 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.78969957082 5.00649968141 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90696013833 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.38993855374 2.71678728327 125% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 139.433497537 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.618025751073 0.580463131201 106% => OK
syllable_count: 433.8 379.143842365 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.8764676599 50.4703680194 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.636363636 104.977214359 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1818181818 20.9669160288 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.25397266985 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.25211458956 0.242375264174 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0760221070982 0.0925447433944 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0581666981386 0.071462118173 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13686387791 0.151781067708 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0363590033118 0.0609392437508 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 12.6369458128 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 24.78 53.1260098522 47% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.3 11.5310837438 141% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.57 8.32886699507 127% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 55.0591133005 158% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.