do you agree that doctors and teachers should be paid more than others?
Recently, the phenomenon of paying doctors and teachers more money than others and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated dispute. Although contested by many that the matter of teaching students is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that bringing up students can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, paying more money to doctors and teachers can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that merits of performing surgeries, as well as long hours of work, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the importance of risky occupation. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both curing people and putting people at ease apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, paying enormous deals of money to doctors and teachers might increase the consequences of high-payed jobs. Moreover, fundamental aspects of the future generation can relate to this reality that demerits of hazardous circumstances pertain to having a stressful job. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of taking high risks is correlated negatively with dangerous situations. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of low-paid jobs.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of paying money to doctors and teachers far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of bringing up future generation prove the significance of the importance of future generation, but also pinpoint various effects of good job implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-31 | Rafia Jawad | 85 | view |
| 2024-08-17 | Rafia Jawad | 88 | view |
| 2024-08-14 | Rafia Jawad | 85 | view |
| 2024-06-06 | Sridarani | 70 | view |
| 2024-05-24 | Sridarani | 69 | view |
- do you agree that the government should reduce their investment in arts, music, and painting? 77
- do you agree that universities should provide so much theoretical knowledge or give more practical training throughout their courses? 80
- do you agree that doctors and teachers should be paid more than others? 88
- Do you that with online information library books are useless? 85
- do you agree that music is as important as other subjects in schools to promote learning in children life? 85
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 31.9359605911 132% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1589.0 1207.87684729 132% => OK
No of words: 289.0 242.827586207 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.49826989619 5.00649968141 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12247647178 2.71678728327 115% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 139.433497537 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.622837370242 0.580463131201 107% => OK
syllable_count: 494.1 379.143842365 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.4287819624 50.4703680194 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.416666667 104.977214359 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0833333333 20.9669160288 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173186313128 0.242375264174 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0559664569428 0.0925447433944 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0656461513989 0.071462118173 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.096155321614 0.151781067708 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0365220146349 0.0609392437508 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 12.6369458128 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 53.1260098522 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.92 11.5310837438 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.24 8.32886699507 123% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 55.0591133005 180% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.