Do you support dangerous activities like extreme skiing, skydiving, and bungee jumping or not? What are the reasons for that?
The discussion on outrageous activities or so call extreme sports is debatable and each side has its logical argument. I am opposing to the idea of these kinds of dangerous activities. I feel this ways for two reasons and I will explore it the following essay.
On one hand critic may point out that extreme sport is a way for people to overcome their fear and acclaim their self-confidence or self-esteem. Many people feel like they become a better person and can express things in many ways that they have never done before. For instance, we can see a growing trend in extremes sport ventures in many countries since many people willing to participate in all sort of dangerous activities and they call themselves a thrill seeker. Hence, extreme sports help people to gain more confidence.
However, despite of this argument, extreme sports result in many devastated incidences and cause dead to many. These activities need to be close inspecting for safety reason but there are still many accidence happened in the past. From my real life experience, one of my friend’s close friends had injury from skydiving and became paralysed form waist down. This cause a long-term trauma and some people regret the choice they made. Therefore, there are extremely dangerous to life for play these sports.
Lastly, in my opinion, instead of play extremely sports, there are many safe sport out there to enjoy.
To conclude, extreme sports is harmful to life and there are so many case of incidence involve.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 193, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...e kinds of dangerous activities. I feel this ways for two reasons and I will explore...
^^^^
Line 5, column 195, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun accidence seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much accidence', 'a good deal of accidence'.
Suggestion: much accidence; a good deal of accidence
...g for safety reason but there are still many accidence happened in the past. From my real life...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 65, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun case seems to be countable; consider using: 'many cases'.
Suggestion: many cases
...rts is harmful to life and there are so many case of incidence involve.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, if, lastly, may, so, still, therefore, for instance, i feel, sort of, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.5418719212 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 8.36945812808 143% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 5.94088669951 34% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 20.9802955665 114% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1264.0 1207.87684729 105% => OK
No of words: 253.0 242.827586207 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99604743083 5.00649968141 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62969747019 2.71678728327 97% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 139.433497537 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592885375494 0.580463131201 102% => OK
syllable_count: 403.2 379.143842365 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.3238037522 50.4703680194 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.2857142857 104.977214359 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0714285714 20.9669160288 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.42857142857 7.25397266985 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.12807881773 121% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 2.75862068966 254% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163831258523 0.242375264174 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0639369029518 0.0925447433944 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0455646629233 0.071462118173 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0905762635183 0.151781067708 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0406144056673 0.0609392437508 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 12.6369458128 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.1260098522 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.9458128079 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.42 11.5310837438 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.32886699507 96% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 55.0591133005 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.94827586207 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.