Do you support dangerous activities like extreme skiing? What are the reasons for that?
Recently, the phenomenon of dangerous activities has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question “what are the reasons for these sports?” Whereas it is a widely held view that extreme sports are highly beneficial, I will discuss controversial aspects of the throughout this essay.
From the medical standpoint, extreme sports are bound up inextricably with medical policies which indicate they lead to both boosting adrenalin and physical health. As a well-known example, longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2014 demonstrates the relationship between extreme skiing and being life-threatening as well as an exponential increase in health achievement. Consequently, my empirical evidence positively with not only dangerous sports but also extreme activities.
Within the realm of sociology, without the slightest doubt, dangerous sports attribute to extreme activities, in that it would come down to extreme skiing and exciting sports. As a silent example of such attribution is spectator sports, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take exciting activities for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint extreme sports problems. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of dangerous activities.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes “all’s well that ends well,” after analyzing what elaborated above, I firmly believe that advantages of dangerous activities are more significant.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 84, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...oes 'all's well that ends well,' after analyzing what elaborated above,...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, if, so, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 31.9359605911 94% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1325.0 1207.87684729 110% => OK
No of words: 229.0 242.827586207 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.78602620087 5.00649968141 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89008302616 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24999981664 2.71678728327 120% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 139.433497537 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.663755458515 0.580463131201 114% => OK
syllable_count: 408.6 379.143842365 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 12.6551724138 71% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.5024630542 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 69.158076218 50.4703680194 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 147.222222222 104.977214359 140% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4444444444 20.9669160288 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.11111111111 7.25397266985 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.268652704084 0.242375264174 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104520732843 0.0925447433944 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0475935532252 0.071462118173 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154395518205 0.151781067708 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0447975488794 0.0609392437508 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.6 12.6369458128 147% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.18 53.1260098522 55% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.9458128079 141% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.6 11.5310837438 144% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.12 8.32886699507 122% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 55.0591133005 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 21.5 9.94827586207 216% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.3980295567 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.4444444444 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.