Do you support dangerous activities like extreme skiing? What are the reasons for that?
Recently, the phenomenon of extreme activities and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that doing sports such as skiing and bungee jumping are highly beneficial. Such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that exciting activities can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From the medical standpoint, regular physical activities can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that health, as well as exhilaration, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the influence that three-hours-per-week exercises can have on peoples’ physical health. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both exercise and excitement can be seen.
Within the realm of science, invigorating effects might increase the consequences of hilarity. Moreover, the fundamental aspects of various sports could relate to this reality that the demerits of injuries pertain to hurts during matches. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of dangerous is correlated negatively to physical disorders. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of hazards when exercising.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of extreme sports far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of invigorating sports prove the significance of mental health, but also pinpoint physical health.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 5.94088669951 202% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1461.0 1207.87684729 121% => OK
No of words: 253.0 242.827586207 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.77470355731 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.30951144479 2.71678728327 122% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 139.433497537 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.648221343874 0.580463131201 112% => OK
syllable_count: 459.0 379.143842365 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.8596167221 50.4703680194 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.384615385 104.977214359 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4615384615 20.9669160288 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.69230769231 7.25397266985 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0971869981344 0.242375264174 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0313251926625 0.0925447433944 34% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0360028873559 0.071462118173 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0560752693555 0.151781067708 37% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0430952578528 0.0609392437508 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 12.6369458128 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 53.1260098522 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.9458128079 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.19 11.5310837438 140% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.45 8.32886699507 125% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 55.0591133005 171% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.94827586207 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.