Do you think consumer should avoid over packaged product, or is it responsibility for producer.
The important effect of packaged product which was debatable but has now become more controversial. The sustainable influence of packaged product has sparked the controversy over the potential impact on over the year. It can be said that over packaging is a waste of resources and leads to environmental damage.
At the outset, there are numerous reason which the packaged product is a waste of resources and leads to environmental damage. For instance, some people argue that customers should refuse to buy over package items. Moreover, over packaging not only affects the environment but also increase the cost of the product. For example, Trees are cut down to produce paper and cardboard. This leads to deforestation.
Another key justification for upholding the notion is downside of over packaging is increase in the price of the product. Manufacturers simply add the cost of packaging to the product. For instance, this it evident that if they avoid the practice, it will benefit the consumer as well as well as the environment.
From what we have discussed above it can be said that impact of packaging product both the buyer and the producer have the responsibility to avoid over packaging. However, in my opinion, the producer has a greater responsibility because they are the ones who actually package the good.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ces and leads to environmental damage. At the outset, there are numerous reason...
^^^
Line 5, column 278, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'as well'.
Suggestion: as well
... practice, it will benefit the consumer as well as well as the environment. From what we ha...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, however, if, moreover, so, well, for example, for instance, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 20.9802955665 67% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 31.9359605911 94% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1117.0 1207.87684729 92% => OK
No of words: 217.0 242.827586207 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14746543779 5.00649968141 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8380880478 3.92707691288 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96718373547 2.71678728327 109% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 139.433497537 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.534562211982 0.580463131201 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 358.2 379.143842365 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.5024630542 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.5985699893 50.4703680194 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.9230769231 104.977214359 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6923076923 20.9669160288 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.15384615385 7.25397266985 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 2.75862068966 217% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.370298521868 0.242375264174 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12639616486 0.0925447433944 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0598060903509 0.071462118173 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.227276381843 0.151781067708 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0290025759264 0.0609392437508 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 12.6369458128 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 53.1260098522 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.9458128079 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.29 11.5310837438 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.32886699507 98% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 55.0591133005 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.3980295567 81% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.