The use of newspaper will be less important in future. Do you agree or disagree with this statement? Explain with reasons and examples.

The newspaper provides an excellent source for providing vital and crucial information to the public. But with the coming of the internet and portable devices, newspaper usage is decreasing rapidly. This essay will discuss why utility of newspaper will be less relevant in the coming future.

The internet has paved a way of fulfilling all essential requirements in the most portable and efficient manner. Due to this, availability of the information is extremely easy nowadays and will continue to become better in the coming years. For instance, content featuring current sports status, election results, and other exciting trends are accessible instantly, in contrast to the newspaper, where such information will be way outdated by the time it's printed and published. Hence, considering such fast accessibility and rich content delivery system, survival of the newspaper will be extremely arduous in coming times.

The newspaper also imposes inevitable negative impacts on the environment and other challenging circumstances. Paper, which is an essential mode of the content delivery system used, poses a direct threat to the environment. Moreover, paper production systems are decreasing rapidly due to decline in demand and supply. Later on, the newspaper production is going to be difficult and surviving with the pressure of instant information sharing platforms will eventually outgrow their uses.

The newspaper is currently the most used platform for information sharing. In my opinion, the newspaper is not going to endure with the possible utilities internet based information sharing junction provide, due to which it will eventually become less significant in the coming future.

Votes
Average: 7.7 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 146, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'utilities'' or 'utility's'?
Suggestion: utilities'; utility's
...s not going to endure with the possible utilities internet based information sharing junc...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, moreover, so, for instance, in contrast, in contrast to, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 8.36945812808 131% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 5.94088669951 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 6.0 20.9802955665 29% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.75862068966 226% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1446.0 1207.87684729 120% => OK
No of words: 257.0 242.827586207 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.62645914397 5.00649968141 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93417723637 2.71678728327 108% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 139.433497537 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56420233463 0.580463131201 97% => OK
syllable_count: 454.5 379.143842365 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.6157635468 22% => OK
Article: 6.0 1.56157635468 384% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.770242904 50.4703680194 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.230769231 104.977214359 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7692307692 20.9669160288 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.07692307692 7.25397266985 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.224489681684 0.242375264174 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0823017749218 0.0925447433944 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0752650651735 0.071462118173 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153920550385 0.151781067708 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0613360928299 0.0609392437508 101% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 12.6369458128 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 53.1260098522 66% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.9458128079 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.37 11.5310837438 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.8 8.32886699507 118% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 55.0591133005 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.