Do you think consumers should avoid over packaged products or it is responsibility of the producer to avoid extra packaged of product give your views any relevant example with your own experience.
One of the most conspicuous trends of today’s world is colossal upsurge in producer should use optimum packaging of products. There is a widespread worry that this will only lead to Myriads of concerns in one’s life however, I do not entirely accept this and I will explain why in this essay.
There are number of arguments in favor of my stance the most preponderant one is that well packaging of products cannot only contribute save product from breakage during transportation, But also lead to numerous other benefits in various field thanks to the wide range of advantages it offers, not only can one benefit more when it comes to being effective, but they can also enhance the productivity and quality of their lives, with much ease efficacy and convenience. Needless to say, all these merits stand one in good stead, as far as augmenting the chances of prosperity and excellence is concerned.
Another pivotal aspect of this aforementioned proposition is that it only likely to help one thrive and excel in varied areas. Besides, only one such follows system, Can they broaden their horizons, thus learning such essential attributes as responsibility, dedication and perseverance Hence it is apparent why many are in the favor of the aforementioned topic.
In view of the arguments outlined above, one can concluded the benefits of the aforementioned topic are indeed too great to ignore.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-12 | English time | 84 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 269, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...attributes as responsibility, dedication and perseverance Hence it is apparent wh...
^^
Line 5, column 364, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the favor of the aforementioned topic. In view of the arguments outlined above,...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, hence, however, if, so, thus, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 5.94088669951 67% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1183.0 1207.87684729 98% => OK
No of words: 231.0 242.827586207 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12121212121 5.00649968141 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89854898053 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97674375023 2.71678728327 110% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 139.433497537 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.614718614719 0.580463131201 106% => OK
syllable_count: 385.2 379.143842365 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.6157635468 22% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 12.6551724138 55% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 20.5024630542 161% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 115.830981721 50.4703680194 230% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 169.0 104.977214359 161% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.0 20.9669160288 157% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.71428571429 7.25397266985 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0855925118915 0.242375264174 35% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0353409912706 0.0925447433944 38% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0438733292276 0.071462118173 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0465179706278 0.151781067708 31% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0365336738683 0.0609392437508 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.2 12.6369458128 152% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.52 53.1260098522 56% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.3 10.9458128079 158% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.01 11.5310837438 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.99 8.32886699507 120% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 55.0591133005 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 9.94827586207 181% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.3980295567 146% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 10.5123152709 171% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.4444444444 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.