Do you think English will remain to be a global language despite globalization?
Recently, the phenomenon of remaining English as a dominant language while globalization occurs has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of English as a master language is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that it is impossible to replace English with another language as an international tool for communication and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From the social standpoint, English as a global language can provide a society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that knowledge development as well as technological improvement, are inextricably bound up. According to my personal experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic examination which discovered statistically approximately 90 percent of scientific articles have been published in English. Thus, the beneficial consequences of English as a global language and society progress apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of communication, English is a language for business and trades. Moreover, the fundamental aspects of being non-development related to this reality that the demerits of speaking in native language pertain to prejudice. As a tangible example, a scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of under developing countries is correlated negatively with a preference of speaking in the local dialect. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of English is a prospect for improvement
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of remaining English as a main communicational language far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of using previous knowledge and inventions prove the significance of English, but also pinpoint broaden one's horizon implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-16 | Rafia Jawad | 72 | view |
| 2024-09-04 | Rafia Jawad | 77 | view |
| 2024-06-11 | Sridarani | 79 | view |
| 2024-05-14 | y.yousefi90@gmail.com | 77 | view |
| 2024-05-14 | y.yousefi90@gmail.com | 77 | view |
- In many countries plastic bags are the main source of rubbish causing pollution in oceans and on land; therefore they could be banned. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 31
- Some universities deduct students scores or penalize them for late submission of assignments. What is your opinion about it and what are the possible solutions? 11
- Do you support dangerous activities like extreme skiing? what are the reasons for that? 77
- In a cashless society, people use more credit cards. what are the advantages and disadvantages of this phenomenon? 89
- Dangerous activities like extreme skiing, bungee jumping, etc. and whether you support them or not. 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 328, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...e of English, but also pinpoint broaden ones horizon implications.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.5418719212 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.75862068966 191% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1662.0 1207.87684729 138% => OK
No of words: 292.0 242.827586207 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.69178082192 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.42280771959 2.71678728327 126% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 139.433497537 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.61301369863 0.580463131201 106% => OK
syllable_count: 538.2 379.143842365 142% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.5024630542 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 58.3878454464 50.4703680194 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 151.090909091 104.977214359 144% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5454545455 20.9669160288 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.25397266985 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.308476855607 0.242375264174 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112961757578 0.0925447433944 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0779325373184 0.071462118173 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168035084041 0.151781067708 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.055815118622 0.0609392437508 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.6 12.6369458128 147% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 28.17 53.1260098522 53% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 10.9458128079 144% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.02 11.5310837438 139% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.87 8.32886699507 131% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 55.0591133005 200% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.3980295567 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.