Do you think that place where the person grew has an influence on his accomplishments? explain with example.
One of the most conspicuous trends of today's world is a colossal upsurge in the number of people believing that where the person grown has an influence on his accomplishments. There is a wide spread worry that this will only lead to myriad of concerns in one's life. However, I do not entirely accept this and I explain why in this essay.
There are a number of arguments in favour of my stance. The most preponderant one is that do you think that place where the person grew has an influence on his accomplishments can not only contribute to attach their feeling with that place, but also lead to numerous other benefits in various fields. Thanks to the wide range of advantages it offers, not only can one benefit more when it comes to being effective, but they can also enhance the productivity and quality of their lives, with much ease, efficacy and convenience. Needless to say, all these merits stand one in good stead, as far as augmenting their chances of prosperity and excellence is concerned.
Another pivotal aspect of the aforementioned proposition is that it is only likely to help one thrive and excel in varied areas. Besides, only when one follows such a system , can they broaden their horizons, thus learning such essential attributes as responsibility, dedication and perseverance. Hence, it is apparent why many are in favour of do you think that place where the person grown has an influence on his accomplishments.
In view of the arguments outlined above, one can conclude that the benefits of do you think that place where the person grown has an influence on his accomplishments are indeed too great to ignore.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-27 | Ammu helen | 88 | view |
| 2019-08-22 | manraj123 | 55 | view |
| 2019-08-22 | manpreet9999 | 80 | view |
| 2018-06-18 | irene123 | 80 | view |
| 2018-06-18 | irene123 | 80 | view |
- In a cashless society, people use more credit cards. What are the advantage and disadvantage of this practice? 77
- Environment pollution is too alarming to be managed by individuals. Real change can be made at the government level. What extent do you agree or disagree? 77
- machine interpretation is slower and less exact than human interpretation and there is on prompt or probability of machine assuming control over this part from people 77
- Stress is now a major problems in many countries around the world. what are some of the factors in modern society that cause this stress and how can we reduce it. 55
- Polygamy has increased widely in recent years. what solutions can you brought forward to decrease this issue? 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 256, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...will only lead to myriad of concerns in ones life. However, I do not entirely accept...
^^^^
Line 3, column 23, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e is concerned. Another pivotal aspect of the aforementioned proposition is tha...
^^
Line 3, column 175, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...des, only when one follows such a system , can they broaden their horizons, thus l...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, hence, however, if, so, thus
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 5.94088669951 252% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 33.0 20.9802955665 157% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1359.0 1207.87684729 113% => OK
No of words: 282.0 242.827586207 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81914893617 5.00649968141 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89115044396 2.71678728327 106% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 139.433497537 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.514184397163 0.580463131201 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 433.8 379.143842365 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.5024630542 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 58.4049697874 50.4703680194 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.545454545 104.977214359 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6363636364 20.9669160288 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.36363636364 7.25397266985 60% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.382405999612 0.242375264174 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.146335784906 0.0925447433944 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.186019204118 0.071462118173 260% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.256174269456 0.151781067708 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0862431955182 0.0609392437508 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 12.6369458128 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 53.1260098522 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 11.5310837438 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.32886699507 102% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 55.0591133005 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.3980295567 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.