Do you think that place where the person grew has an influence on his accomplishments? Explain with example.
The importance of do you think that place where the person grew has an influence on his accomplishment which has always been debatable, has haw upsurge a lot of arguments in favor and against it. Thus it has become even more controversial. The substantial influence of do you think that place where the person grew has an influence on his accomplishment has sparked the controversy over the potential of this trends in an integral part of the society in the recent years. It can be agreed that upside of do you think that place where the person grew has an influence on his accomplishment is instruments indeed. However, it has some various drawbacks as well. This easy will be elaborate both assertion and will provide to a well-weighted conclusion.
At the outset, there are numerous reasons. Why do you think that place where the person grew has an influence on his accomplishment is unreservedly salient, but the most conspicuous one leis in the fact that do you think that place where the person grew has an influence on his accomplishment for instance. Therefore, it is clearly vital of do you think that place where the person grew has an influence on his accomplishment time for people appreciate in significance of do you think that place where the person grew has an influence on his accomplishment for the overall amelioration of society.
The above presented dissertation illustrates both perspectives about the impact of do you think that place where the person grew has an influence on his accomplishment, while it is evident that it has some various benefits, althought its deleterious effect cannot be ignored and have to be addressed and well balanced against it merits.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-27 | Ammu helen | 88 | view |
| 2019-08-22 | manraj123 | 55 | view |
| 2019-08-22 | manpreet9999 | 80 | view |
| 2018-06-18 | irene123 | 80 | view |
| 2018-06-18 | irene123 | 80 | view |
- small test 77
- The ownership of cars should be restricted to one per family in order to reduce the traffic congestion and pollution. to what extent do you agree or disagree. 75
- we have entered a throwaway society and fill the environment with rubbish 80
- The time people devote in the the job leaves very little time for personal life 77
- technological access to online music 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 197, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...t of arguments in favor and against it. Thus it has become even more controversial. ...
^^^^
Line 1, column 405, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...d the controversy over the potential of this trends in an integral part of the socie...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 20.0 5.94088669951 337% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 38.0 20.9802955665 181% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 5.75862068966 399% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1407.0 1207.87684729 116% => OK
No of words: 285.0 242.827586207 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93684210526 5.00649968141 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08930182731 2.71678728327 114% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 139.433497537 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.421052631579 0.580463131201 73% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 435.6 379.143842365 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.65517241379 27% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.5024630542 137% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 104.83148382 50.4703680194 208% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 140.7 104.977214359 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.5 20.9669160288 136% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.4 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.12807881773 73% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.681556085246 0.242375264174 281% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.309389004505 0.0925447433944 334% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.271137371195 0.071462118173 379% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.51153233428 0.151781067708 337% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.169724859862 0.0609392437508 279% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 12.6369458128 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 53.1260098522 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.9458128079 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 11.5310837438 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.32886699507 97% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 55.0591133005 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.3980295567 127% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.