Do you think that young people should be restricted on certain things that they can do such as driving or smoking until they reach the age of 25? What are your views on this?
Recently, the phenomenon of "young people should be restricted on certain things that they can do such as driving or smoking until they reach the age of 25" and its corresponding impact has sparked a long-running dispute. Whereas many people are debating the proposition that watching teenagers might be remarkably fruitful, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a remarkable number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that restricting young people to do some activities can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From the society standpoint, restricting young people on certain things such as driving can provide the society with profound effects, which might stem from the fact that learning a proper lifestyle and avoiding some activities are inextricably bound up. Regarding my personal experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment that discovered the effects of smoking on youngsters. Thus, invaluable ramifications of both being mature and reaching legal age distinctly can be observed.
Within the realm of psychology, without the slightest doubt, restricting adolescence on certain activities might exacerbate the already catastrophic consequences of self-esteem. Moreover, fundamental aspects of the teenager's characters can relate to the reality that the demerits of not controlling them can pertain to parents' deficiency. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that if the downsides of adolescence activities were correlated positively with good relationships with parents, the local authorities would ultimately address mental issues. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the preconceived notion of teenagers' desires.
To conclude, despite several compelling arguments on both sides, I opt to support the idea that the merits of restricting young people on certain things until they reach the age of 25 far outweigh its downsides.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 209, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...nd its corresponding impact has sparked a long-running dispute. Whereas many people are debati...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, moreover, regarding, so, thus, whereas, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 6.10837438424 196% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 20.9802955665 110% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 31.9359605911 128% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1704.0 1207.87684729 141% => OK
No of words: 299.0 242.827586207 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.69899665552 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21325497747 2.71678728327 118% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 139.433497537 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598662207358 0.580463131201 103% => OK
syllable_count: 526.5 379.143842365 139% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.5024630542 132% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 58.6458766068 50.4703680194 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 154.909090909 104.977214359 148% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.1818181818 20.9669160288 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.27272727273 7.25397266985 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.41217250052 0.242375264174 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.135129842856 0.0925447433944 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.149668487193 0.071462118173 209% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.242542064309 0.151781067708 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.152789677983 0.0609392437508 251% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.0 12.6369458128 150% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.15 53.1260098522 51% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 10.9458128079 148% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.08 11.5310837438 139% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.68 8.32886699507 128% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 55.0591133005 196% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.3980295567 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.