Does the advent of Internet change the role of teacher? To what extent do you agree?
The discussion on advancement of technology evolve teacher role is a debatable one and each side has its logical arguments. I am more incline to believe that Internet does not change the role of teacher but it is a tool to enhance the role of teacher.
On one hand critics point out that accessibility of Internet has made teacher role less important. Some young learner can acquire knowledge through online learning, and teacher will only play a small part of this process to assist their students. For instance, many long distances learning industry has boomed in this last decade. Therefore, Internet has changed teacher roles in some realm of studies.
However, in spite of argument above that internet has evolved teacher roles with online course, teacher role is still extremely crucial in help students for their learning and guiding. Firstly, many academic studies need teachers in class to further emphasis on lecture and explain all the complex ideas, which is unable to be done by Internet itself. Secondly, Internet is only a tool to help students to do further research outside the class but they are still need teacher to nurture them to understand their learning process or research assignment. Thirdly, Internet doesn’t produce a good citizen in society, but teacher can give advice and tell students what is righteous act to do in life.
Lastly, in my opinion, advent in Internet cannot change the role of teacher but to help them improve their teaching process.
In conclusion, Internet can change teacher role because students still need face-to-face explanation in class, Internet on help student research student and internet make student a citizen.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 464, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'needed'.
Suggestion: needed
...ch outside the class but they are still need teacher to nurture them to understand t...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, lastly, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, third, thirdly, for instance, in conclusion, in my opinion, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.5418719212 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 8.36945812808 131% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 5.94088669951 67% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 31.9359605911 125% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1417.0 1207.87684729 117% => OK
No of words: 273.0 242.827586207 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19047619048 5.00649968141 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59879203255 2.71678728327 96% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 139.433497537 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553113553114 0.580463131201 95% => OK
syllable_count: 435.6 379.143842365 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.6157635468 22% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.9798560389 50.4703680194 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.083333333 104.977214359 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.75 20.9669160288 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.75 7.25397266985 176% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.12807881773 121% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.361588183189 0.242375264174 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.153050107496 0.0925447433944 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0980967448652 0.071462118173 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.222323699224 0.151781067708 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0469228105166 0.0609392437508 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 12.6369458128 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.1260098522 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 11.5310837438 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.32886699507 106% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 55.0591133005 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.