Does video communication with doctor help patients to cure any disease? Pros & Cons?
The importance of treating any disease through video conference was always a debatable topic. Many people claim that it is beneficial to people who are disabled. Others reject this notion and argue that all diseases cannot be cured in video communication. In my opinion, latter proposition appears to be more rational. The following essay would further elaborate both advantages and disadvantages of video communication with proper examples and thus lead to a plausible conclusion.
To start with, there are more benefits that can be attributed to virtual communication among patients and doctors. The most important one is that availability of physician after working hours is the major relief for the patients. In the fast developing world, technology has made us reach to any doctor for any type of disease. For example, parents are always worried about health of their kids and availability of video communication option assure them that in case of emergency they can reach out to them anytime.
On the other hand, there are some pitfalls that can easily overwhelm the potential benefits of the video communication between doctor and patient. Firstly, technology cannot be accessed by all the people especially those who are living in rural areas and rural cannot use technology to communicate to physicians to cure disease. Secondly, people need to have a strong bond with doctor to understand the severity of pain and physical presence helps to understand the pain of patient to doctor. Finally, patient and doctor may have miscommunication and misunderstands the symptoms and causes to treat the disease. For example, skin diseases such as allergy need to be treated in presence of doctor which cannot be cured through online video.
According to the arguments aforementioned, one can reach out to conclusion that although there are some advantages of video communication but the disadvantages outweighs it.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-05-24 | mndpsngh21 | 85 | view |
| 2020-03-11 | manraj123 | 85 | view |
| 2020-01-17 | yasamin.gharib62 | 77 | view |
| 2019-09-14 | English time | 77 | view |
| 2019-09-13 | yasamin.gharib62 | 11 | view |
- Whether parents should be held legally be responsible for children 84
- The time people devote in job leaves very little time for personal life How widespread is the problem What problem will this shortage of time causes 81
- The traditional subjects are soon moving off in last year's. Kindly provide the solutions and ideas to save such subjects. 77
- Personal Development is the base for professional development and advancing in one s career To what extent do you agree or disagree 79
- The belching and unauthorized behavior is unacceptable in modern offices. How far you support this view? Give your response with justification. 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 591, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'treating'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'cause' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: treating
... misunderstands the symptoms and causes to treat the disease. For example, skin diseases...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 138, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e some advantages of video communication but the disadvantages outweighs it.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, firstly, may, second, secondly, so, thus, for example, such as, in my opinion, to start with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.5418719212 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 6.10837438424 196% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 8.36945812808 143% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 31.9359605911 153% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.75862068966 208% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1622.0 1207.87684729 134% => OK
No of words: 304.0 242.827586207 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33552631579 5.00649968141 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00467087905 2.71678728327 111% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 139.433497537 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.549342105263 0.580463131201 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 522.9 379.143842365 138% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 4.6157635468 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6551724138 119% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.2086158332 50.4703680194 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.133333333 104.977214359 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2666666667 20.9669160288 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.8 7.25397266985 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.306550150341 0.242375264174 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0953787299401 0.0925447433944 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0587505242548 0.071462118173 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168257844639 0.151781067708 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0663181161372 0.0609392437508 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 12.6369458128 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 53.1260098522 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 11.5310837438 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.32886699507 107% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 55.0591133005 149% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.94827586207 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.