Does video communication with doctor help patients to cure any disease? Pros & Cons?
In this contemporary world, technology is touching new skies every day and introducing different types of technologies those are changing shape of our world. Using video calls, it is possible to interact with doctors from anywhere. One group is in favour of myriad benefits of this practice while some individuals stress on negative side of this. This contentious topic has been profoundly debated on several forums. I will discuss both the advantages and disadvantage meticulously before inclining towards a rational conclusion.
Throwing lights on the advantages, video communication can be a boon for people those live in remote areas and it makes possible that they can consult a doctor from any location. A person who stays at a place where there is no specialist available for particular disease can take of this science invention. Moreover, it also helps to save a good amount of money by cutting expenditure which is required to travel from one place to another place. To illustrate, according to BBC News 1 million people got cured by online communication.
Paradoxically, there are some in depth examination those are required by doctor to provide an accurate suggestion for his patient but call based consultation can be inaccurate in many scenarios. Any disease which required different type of check-ups require personal presence of doctor and medical instruments which can be missing in call communication. For instance, a person with skin related problem required physical examination otherwise it can be inefficient for patient.
To conclude, advantages of remote consultation outweighs the disadvantages so it can provide lot of benefits for patients those are present in location where availability of doctor is not possible.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, so, while, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.5418719212 142% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 31.9359605911 125% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 5.75862068966 243% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1475.0 1207.87684729 122% => OK
No of words: 274.0 242.827586207 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38321167883 5.00649968141 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11264233043 2.71678728327 115% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 139.433497537 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.627737226277 0.580463131201 108% => OK
syllable_count: 487.8 379.143842365 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.8815578855 50.4703680194 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.461538462 104.977214359 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0769230769 20.9669160288 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.69230769231 7.25397266985 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 6.9802955665 43% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 2.75862068966 217% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.171801242123 0.242375264174 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0563903261283 0.0925447433944 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0519041608304 0.071462118173 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0941277450535 0.151781067708 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0330000151394 0.0609392437508 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 12.6369458128 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 11.5310837438 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.46 8.32886699507 114% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 55.0591133005 151% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.94827586207 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.