Education should be accessible to people of all economic backgrounds All levels of education from primary school to tertiary education should be free To what extent do you agree with this opinion

Essay topics:

Education should be accessible to people of all economic backgrounds. All levels of education, from primary school to tertiary education, should be free.

To what extent do you agree with this opinion?

Education is now a topic of rising interest. Everyone has to get education irrespective of their economic background. This essay will discuss if education should be provided free of cost at all levels.
Generally, the quality of higher education is steadily coming down over the last few decades. If education is made free to all, this problem will worsen. For example, the median salary for a college professor has increased two times over last four years. It is thereby clear that free education will not be a sustainable model for future and it will further dilute the quality of education.
The number of high-income people in the society is increasing rapidly across the globe. For people who can afford to pay the tuition fees, there is no need for free primary or tertiary education. Students with low household income can be given scholarships to pay for the education. There is no need to provide free tuition for all levels of education.
This essay discussed that free education can negatively affect the quality of teaching and also the income distribution in current society does not justify a need for free education at all levels of education. By above-mentioned reasons, it can be concluded that education from primary school to university should not be free.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (4 votes)
Essay Categories

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, as to, for example

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 6.10837438424 213% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 3.0 8.36945812808 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 5.94088669951 67% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 20.9802955665 48% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 31.9359605911 85% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 5.75862068966 295% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1066.0 1207.87684729 88% => OK
No of words: 213.0 242.827586207 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.00469483568 5.00649968141 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82027741392 3.92707691288 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76877511359 2.71678728327 102% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 139.433497537 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.535211267606 0.580463131201 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 347.4 379.143842365 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.65517241379 27% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.5024630542 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.7617162965 50.4703680194 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.0 104.977214359 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3846153846 20.9669160288 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.84615384615 7.25397266985 39% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.357037551103 0.242375264174 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.133905032496 0.0925447433944 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0931375041096 0.071462118173 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.23169853932 0.151781067708 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0707072468553 0.0609392437508 116% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 12.6369458128 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 53.1260098522 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.9458128079 87% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.42 11.5310837438 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.32886699507 101% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 55.0591133005 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.94827586207 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.3980295567 81% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 65.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 58.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.