Environment pollution is too alarming to be managed by individuals. Real change can be made at the government level. What extent do you agree or disagree?
Managing the enviromental pollution by governments
has become a controversial issue among the public. Although it is regarded by an array of inhabitants as thoroughly both constructive and positive, others hold opponents views. I am inclined to profoundly believe that this theme is beneficial as it could develop brilliant aspects for its adherents.
There are several reasons why controling some environmental pollution including air, water and sound pollution should be implemented by governments instead of the local citizens. First and foremost, this management is quite costly. Diminishing the amount of any environmental pollution needs a considerable amonut of energy. For instance, there is a significant amonut of time and money is spent annually by governments in order to declining this topic. Furthermore, this such a big target needs to some strict rules. According to a recent research which was conducted by the Tehran University the cities which have punishmental legislation for conservation the nature, have lower rate of pullution than the others.
In addition, another crucial factor in this issue is culture. It is crystal clear that the societies which have rich culture have lower amount of pollution. In these nations both settlers and governments have a type of self-control in order to care the nature. Of course governments have a big duty to increase culture by enhancing populations' awareness.
In conclusion, while the managing the environmental pollution by governments have some demerits, I strongly believe that its benefits outweigh the drawbacks.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-26 | amk79msce | 88 | view |
| 2020-01-06 | manraj123 | 11 | view |
| 2020-01-06 | manraj123 | 11 | view |
| 2020-01-03 | Ammu helen | 55 | view |
| 2019-12-30 | madhutalaari@gmail.com | 65 | view |
- Companies use advertisements to influence people to buy things sometimes which they don’t need. Give your opinion about this practice? 77
- In many countries, the proportion of older people is steadily increasing. Does this trend have more positive or negative effects on the society? 77
- Effective learning requires time, comfort and peace so it is impossible to combine study and employment. Study and employment distract one from another. To what extent do you think the statements are realistic? Support your opinion with examples? 77
- In developing countries, tourism has disadvantages or advantages? 77
- Extreme sports Dangerous activities like skiing bungee jumping rafting diving should be banned Agree or disagree 79
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, so, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, of course
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 6.10837438424 33% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 20.9802955665 76% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 31.9359605911 91% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.75862068966 208% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1352.0 1207.87684729 112% => OK
No of words: 242.0 242.827586207 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.5867768595 5.00649968141 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94415379849 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1884978721 2.71678728327 117% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 139.433497537 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595041322314 0.580463131201 103% => OK
syllable_count: 428.4 379.143842365 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.5024630542 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.4030093553 50.4703680194 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.5714285714 104.977214359 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2857142857 20.9669160288 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.14285714286 7.25397266985 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.12807881773 121% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.10544200398 0.242375264174 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0371353128537 0.0925447433944 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.044005306634 0.071462118173 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0833267660061 0.151781067708 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0708854134762 0.0609392437508 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 12.6369458128 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 53.1260098522 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.85 11.5310837438 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.76 8.32886699507 117% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 55.0591133005 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.94827586207 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.3980295567 85% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.