The debate over environmental problems are too serious for
individuals to solve and only government can solve them is an old
one, with the attitude of people shifting through out the debate over
the years. Proponents and opponents make their cases to support
their views on this unresolved issue. In my opinion, environmental
problems are not too serious for individuals to solve.
There are numerous arguments surrounding my view point, but the
most important factor that needs to be considered relates to
willingness. In other words, self-motivation which can drive anyone
what they want to do. Statistics from credible sources also reveal
that individuals who helps the government for any environmental
problems are the most successful government in the world. To
elaborate further, few relevant examples can be taken into
consideration. A survey conducted by a research institute in Australia
has revealed that when the government and individuals work
together for any environmental problems the problems becomes
more easier to solve. So, it will not be wrong to say that
environmental problems are not too serious for individuals to solve.
On the other side of the fence, it is also possible to make the
opposing case. It can be argued that it is not easy for an individual to
solve an environmental problem by himself/herself.
In the light of the above discussion, it seems fair and justifiable to say
that environmental problems are not too serious for the individuals
to solve.
- 'Environmental problems are too great to be managed by individuals so realchange can only be achieved at government level.'To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Support yourpoint of view with reasons and/or examples from your own ex 77
- Medical technology is responsible for the human's life expectancy. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 43, Rule ID: THROUGH_OUT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'throughout'?
Suggestion: throughout
...e, with the attitude of people shifting through out the debate over the years. Proponents ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 18, column 1, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'easier' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: easier
...onmental problems the problems becomes more easier to solve. So, it will not be wrong to s...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, in my opinion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1296.0 1207.87684729 107% => OK
No of words: 241.0 242.827586207 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.377593361 5.00649968141 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94007293032 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15616290796 2.71678728327 116% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 139.433497537 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.522821576763 0.580463131201 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 394.2 379.143842365 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.65517241379 219% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.0786616077 50.4703680194 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.0 104.977214359 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0833333333 20.9669160288 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 7.25397266985 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 23.0 4.12807881773 557% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.25910884139 0.242375264174 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0993217199541 0.0925447433944 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0449566946674 0.071462118173 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0745680253427 0.151781067708 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0425111591966 0.0609392437508 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 12.6369458128 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.1260098522 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.9458128079 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 11.5310837438 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.64 8.32886699507 92% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 55.0591133005 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.