Government should build more roads to allow more vechiles owner or improve the network of public transport
Surely there has been no time in history where the lives of people have changed more dramatically. A quick reflection on typical day reveals public transport has been one of the prominent topics in the contemporary discussion. People have always been intrigued to analyze and explain. Regarding, this I would say, it has many obstacles like pollution and many more can be solved by implementing the solutions will be discussed in this essay.
To begin this, government should build more roads for public to allow more vehicles on road. On the flip side, more private vehicles on road required more roads to have sufficient space for the vehicles. Private vehicles surely help people to save a lot of time and energy by opting for daily travel but more vehicles on road also can lead to have more chances of road accidents, more traffic and more pollution
In conclusion, the forgoing discussion propound the view that improved network of public transportation is more essential than the more road construction as it saves our environment and planet.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-04-25 | Rafia Jawad | 11 | view |
| 2023-05-06 | nganvuong | 55 | view |
| 2021-12-14 | bilalaslam239@gmail.com | 77 | view |
| 2021-03-07 | honorrr | 85 | view |
| 2019-12-17 | jashan randhawa | 77 | view |
- There are social, medical, technical problems associated with the use of mobile phone. Do you agree that the problems the benefits of mobile phone. 77
- Foreign languages should be made a compulsory in the primary school.How far do you agree with the above statement? 55
- Travelling by air among rich and ordinary people.To what extent do you agree and disagree? 72
- Any recent invention that you think proved beneficial or determined to society. 55
- Air travel can benefit the richest people in the world. ordinary people can get no advantage with development of air travel. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 72
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, regarding, so, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.5418719212 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 5.94088669951 34% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 20.9802955665 38% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 31.9359605911 72% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 883.0 1207.87684729 73% => OK
No of words: 175.0 242.827586207 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04571428571 5.00649968141 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.92707691288 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73389010424 2.71678728327 101% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 139.433497537 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.580463131201 103% => OK
syllable_count: 280.8 379.143842365 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 12.6551724138 55% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.5024630542 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 107.831122689 50.4703680194 214% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 126.142857143 104.977214359 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 20.9669160288 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.57142857143 7.25397266985 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.12807881773 73% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.442281278658 0.242375264174 182% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.194063889836 0.0925447433944 210% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.183455384286 0.071462118173 257% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.286756684516 0.151781067708 189% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.129820665699 0.0609392437508 213% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 12.6369458128 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 53.1260098522 87% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.9458128079 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 11.5310837438 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.32886699507 109% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 55.0591133005 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.94827586207 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.3980295567 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 200 words wanted.
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.