Should government build more roads to allow more vehicle owner or improve the network of public transport?
One of the most conspicuous treads of today’s world is colossal upsurge in the number of people think that government should build more roads which are more beneficial for public. There is a widespread worry that this will only lead to a myriad of concerns in one’s life. However, I do not entirely accept this and I will explain why in this essay.
There are a number of arguments in favor of my stance. The most preponderant one is that government should improve public transport so, most of people can travel through public transport and less people take their own cars on roads. it can not only contribute to help people to save their precious time but also lead to numerous other benefits in various field. Thanks to a wide range of advantages being offered by network of public transport, not only can one benefit more when it comes to being effective, but also enhance the productivity and standard of their life, with much ease, efficacy and convenience. Needleless to say, all these merits stand one in good stead, as far as augmenting their chances of a better life is concerned.
Another pivotal aspect of the aforementioned proposition is that it is not only likely to help one thrive and excel in varied areas. Besides, only when one follows such a system, can one broaden their horizons, thus learning such essential attributes as responsibilities, dedication and perseverance. Hence, it is apparent why many are in favor of public transport.
In view of the arguments outlined above, one can conclude that, the benefits of development of public transport are indeed too great to ignore.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 136, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the people') or simply say ''most people''.
Suggestion: most of the people; most people
...ent should improve public transport so, most of people can travel through public transport and...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 191, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun people is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...can travel through public transport and less people take their own cars on roads. it...
^^^^
Line 2, column 233, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...ss people take their own cars on roads. it can not only contribute to help people ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, hence, however, if, so, thus
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 31.9359605911 122% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1338.0 1207.87684729 111% => OK
No of words: 273.0 242.827586207 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9010989011 5.00649968141 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75794743746 2.71678728327 102% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 139.433497537 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567765567766 0.580463131201 98% => OK
syllable_count: 423.9 379.143842365 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.0901382468 50.4703680194 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.5 104.977214359 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.75 20.9669160288 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 7.25397266985 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211250843232 0.242375264174 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0701593985829 0.0925447433944 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100939314648 0.071462118173 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11915031796 0.151781067708 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0669669350242 0.0609392437508 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 12.6369458128 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.1260098522 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 11.5310837438 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.32886699507 102% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 55.0591133005 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.94827586207 106% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.