The government should reduce their investment in arts, music, and painting. Agree or disagree?
Recently, the phenomenon of reducing the investment in the art by the government and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of the valuable painting is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined that putting investment in the art and music by the government can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, considering the governmental investment in art sector can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that merits of man-made goods, as well as the exhibition of sculpture, are inextricably bound up. According to my experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the influence of governmental financial support on preserving the art values. Thus, the beneficial ramification of both the masterpiece and the contemporary art are apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of art, putting investment in art and music might increase the consequences of the popularity of art among young generation. Moreover, fundamental aspects of an art exhibition could relate to this reality that the merits of the visual art pertain to the accomplished painter. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of spending money in art is correlated negatively with lack of money in other social sectors.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the drawbacks of reducing money in art sector by the government far outweigh its benefits. Not only do the advantages of preserving the art value prove the significance of setting up more art exhibition, but also pinpoint social implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 31.9359605911 144% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 5.75862068966 278% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1599.0 1207.87684729 132% => OK
No of words: 297.0 242.827586207 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38383838384 5.00649968141 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22361340553 2.71678728327 119% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 139.433497537 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56228956229 0.580463131201 97% => OK
syllable_count: 507.6 379.143842365 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.5024630542 132% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 40.6637085136 50.4703680194 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.363636364 104.977214359 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0 20.9669160288 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.36363636364 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0943915113574 0.242375264174 39% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.044375055075 0.0925447433944 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0580655002389 0.071462118173 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0668048117351 0.151781067708 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0539299412289 0.0609392437508 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 12.6369458128 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 53.1260098522 67% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.22 11.5310837438 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.03 8.32886699507 120% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 55.0591133005 173% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.3980295567 123% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.